Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
Published on: March 17, 2023
Pharmacists' and pharmacy technicians' views on a process of revalidation of pharmacy professionals in Great Britain
Helen Potter1, Karen Hassell, Peter R Noyce
1NHS Trafford, 3rd Floor, Oakland House, Talbot Road, Old Trafford, Manchester, UK.
Background:
Revalidation will be introduced for pharmacy professionals in Great Britain. However, what pharmacists and technicians understand about it as a process remains unexplored.
Objectives:
This study aimed to explore the views of pharmacists and technicians about the revalidation of fitness to practice. Views were gathered on the sources of evidence that could be used, assessment methods, who should undertake the assessment, and how often it should occur.
Methods:
A multiple methods study was conducted with community and hospital pharmacists and technicians. It included 6 focus groups, 14 one-to-one interviews, and a postal survey sent in March 2009 to a 10% randomly selected sample of 4640 practising pharmacists and 738 technicians working in England, Scotland, and Wales.
Results:
Twenty-nine pharmacists and 16 technicians participated in the focus groups and interviews; 1206 (26.4%) pharmacists and 240 (32.8%) technicians returned a completed questionnaire. A large majority of both pharmacists (86%) and technicians (81%) were in favor of continuing professional development (CPD) records being used as evidence to inform revalidation, but only a small proportion of both groups agreed that patient feedback should be used. Evidence from appraisals and peers/colleagues was also well supported. Technicians were significantly more likely than pharmacists to indicate that their assessment for revalidation should be undertaken by their main employer. Although most technicians (49%) believed that revalidation should take place every 2-3 years, most pharmacists (58%) believed that it should occur only every 5 years.
Conclusions:
Pharmacists and technicians do not share the same views on all aspects of revalidation, suggesting that 1 single model may not be desirable or practicable. Both groups identified CPD, appraisal, and feedback from peers as possible components of revalidation, but concerns about impartiality and independence of assessors were raised.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Excipients and Impurities-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation

