Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What is applied about "applied" philosophy?

L M Kopelman1

  • 1Department of Medical Humanities, East Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27858.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|April 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Teaching medical humanities in the tradition of John Dewey.

Current surgery·2005
Same author

Moral problems in assessing research risk.

IRB·2002
Same author

Do children get their fair share of health and dental care?

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2001
Same author

On duties to provide basic health and dental care to children.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2001
Same author

Children as research subjects: a dilemma.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2001
Same author

Fetal protection in Wisconsin's revised child abuse law: right goal, wrong remedy.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2000

The study argues that "applied" philosophical fields are not derivative. Principles used in these fields may change during application, challenging traditional views of applied science and philosophy.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Epistemology
  • Applied Ethics

Background:

  • The term "applied" in philosophy often implies a derivative status.
  • Traditional views suggest applied fields rely on unchanged foundational principles.
  • This perspective raises questions about the nature of philosophical inquiry in practical contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the notion of "applied" philosophical fields.
  • To challenge the view that these fields are merely derivative.
  • To propose a revised understanding of "application" in philosophical contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the term "applied" in philosophy.
  • Examination of foundationalist epistemological theories.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Argumentation against the derivative status of applied philosophical fields.

    • Main Results:

    • The principles, judgments, or theories used in applied philosophy are subject to change during their application.
    • This potential for change refutes the idea that applied fields are derivative.
    • Foundationalist arguments for the privileged status of applied principles were found insufficient.

    Conclusions:

    • The designation "applied" for philosophical fields should be reconsidered or redefined.
    • Applied philosophical endeavors are not inherently derivative.
    • A more dynamic understanding of "application" is necessary in philosophy.