Related Experiment Videos
Effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on postoperative recovery profile of children undergoing surgery for spinal
Nidhi Gupta1, Girija P Rath, Hemanshu Prabhakar
1Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Insights
Dexmedetomidine use in children undergoing spinal surgery significantly reduced postoperative pain and emergence agitation (EA). This anesthetic approach improved recovery without adverse hemodynamic effects, benefiting pediatric patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Neurosurgery
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Smooth emergence from anesthesia is crucial for pediatric patients undergoing spinal dysraphism surgery.
- Dexmedetomidine offers potential benefits including sedation, anxiolysis, and opioid-sparing effects with minimal respiratory compromise.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative dexmedetomidine in improving postoperative recovery in children undergoing spinal surgery.
- To assess its impact on pain, emergence agitation, and hemodynamic stability.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 36 children (8-12 years) undergoing lumbosacral spinal dysraphism surgery.
- Dexmedetomidine or saline placebo was administered post-positioning in prone. Sevoflurane and fentanyl consumption were monitored.
- Postoperative pain, emergence agitation (EA), and recovery were assessed using validated scales.
Main Results:
- Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced intraoperative sevoflurane and fentanyl consumption, and intraoperative heart rate.
- Children receiving dexmedetomidine experienced significantly lower postoperative pain and EA scores.
- Postoperative fentanyl use was reduced, and time to first analgesic request was prolonged in the dexmedetomidine group. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was also lower.
Conclusions:
- Intraoperative dexmedetomidine administration promotes a favorable recovery profile in pediatric spinal surgery patients.
- It effectively reduces postoperative pain and emergence agitation without compromising hemodynamic stability.
- Dexmedetomidine is a valuable adjunct for optimizing anesthesia recovery in this population.
Background:
Smooth recovery from anesthesia is desirable in children undergoing surgery for spinal dysraphism who are nursed in prone position during the postoperative period. Dexmedetomidine may be beneficial in these children owing to its sedative, anxiolytic, and opioid-sparing properties with minimal respiratory depression.
Methods:
Thirty-six children with spinal dysraphism at lumbosacral area, aged 8 to 12 years, undergoing corrective surgery were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine or volume-matched saline (placebo) after positioned prone until beginning of skin closure. Inspired concentration of sevoflurane was changed to keep the bispectral index score between 45 and 55. Perioperative hemodynamics, intraoperative fentanyl and sevoflurane consumption, and postoperative recovery profile and fentanyl consumption was observed by blinded observers. Postoperative pain, emergence agitation (EA), and discharge readiness from postanesthesia care unit was evaluated using the modified objective pain score, agitation Cole score, and modified Aldrete score, respectively. Fentanyl 0.5-1 µg/kg was administered for pain (objective pain score ≥4) or severe EA (agitation Cole score ≥4) lasting for >5 minutes.
Results:
The 2 groups did not differ significantly with respect to demographics, duration of anesthesia, emergence, and extubation times. The intraoperative consumption of sevoflurane and fentanyl was significantly less in dexmedetomidine group (0.2±0.1 vs. 0.3±0.1 mL/min, P<0.0001 and 2.3±0.5 vs. 3.1±0.6 μg/kg, P=0.0001, respectively), along with a lower mean heart rate (P<0.001). The mean systolic blood pressure (P=0.98) and incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was comparable in between the 2 groups. Postoperatively, the children in dexmedetomidine group had significantly lower pain scores (P<0.0001), agitation scores (P<0.0001), and time to achieve full modified Aldrete score [0 (0 to 10) vs. 10 (0 to 20) min, P=0.001]. The postoperative consumption of fentanyl was significantly less in dexmedetomidine group [0 (0 to 1.04) vs. 0.88 (0 to 3) µg/kg, P=0.003], along with a longer time of first analgesic requirement [600 (5 to 2100) vs. 5 (5 to 185) min, P=0.0001]. The mean heart rate and systolic blood pressure were higher in placebo group (P<0.001), whereas no difference was observed in respiratory rate (P=0.73) and arterial oxygen saturation (P=0.36). The number of patients with postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group [2 (11.1%) vs. 9 (50%), P=0.03].
Conclusions:
Intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing spinal surgery results in a favorable recovery profile with reduced postoperative pain and EA, without adverse perioperative hemodynamic effects.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Stages of General Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics