Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficiency of two provider-endorsed manual paediatric

Evan T Cole1, Greg Harvey, Gary Foster

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, McMaster Children's Hospital and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

BMJ Open
|March 26, 2013
PubMed

Insights

This study compared two paediatric fluid resuscitation techniques. The disconnect-reconnect method demonstrated a faster fluid administration rate than the push-pull technique in simulated paediatric shock scenarios.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Paediatric Critical Care

Background:

  • Paediatric shock is a critical condition requiring rapid fluid resuscitation.
  • Current guidelines recommend rapid fluid administration, but evidence on optimal techniques is limited.
  • This gap hinders effective knowledge translation in clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the fluid administration rates of the disconnect-reconnect and push-pull techniques in simulated paediatric shock.
  • To assess catheter dislodgement rates and provider fatigue associated with each technique.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized crossover trial involving healthcare providers at McMaster Children's Hospital.
  • Participants administered 900 ml of normal saline to a simulated 15 kg infant using both techniques.
  • The primary outcome was the rate of fluid administration, analyzed using a paired t-test.

Main Results:

  • The disconnect-reconnect technique resulted in a significantly higher fluid administration rate compared to the push-pull technique.
  • Further analysis will detail catheter dislodgement and provider fatiguability.

Conclusions:

  • The disconnect-reconnect technique appears more effective for rapid fluid resuscitation in simulated paediatric shock.
  • Findings may inform clinical practice and improve paediatric resuscitation outcomes.
Abstract