Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate + error bound)
The...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond uniform perception: Individual and stimulus-specific differences in visual working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

How do people build up visual memory representations from sensory evidence? Revisiting two classic models of choice.

Journal of mathematical psychology·2024
Same author

Repeated rock, paper, scissors play reveals limits in adaptive sequential behavior.

Cognitive psychology·2024
Same author

Author Correction: Local but not global graph theoretic measures of semantic networks generalize across tasks.

Behavior research methods·2023
Same author

Local but not global graph theoretic measures of semantic networks generalize across tasks.

Behavior research methods·2023
Same author

Structured visuospatial representations revealed through serial reproduction.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2023
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Quantifying error distributions in crowding.

Deborah Hanus1, Edward Vul

  • 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Journal of Vision
|March 26, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual crowding makes object identification difficult. This study reveals that both spatial intrusions and letter confusions contribute to errors, with an independent intrusion model outperforming naive pooling models in explaining these visual perception errors.

More Related Videos

Quantifying Spatiotemporal Parameters of Cellular Exocytosis in Micropatterned Cells
10:21

Quantifying Spatiotemporal Parameters of Cellular Exocytosis in Micropatterned Cells

Published on: September 16, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Quantifying Spatiotemporal Parameters of Cellular Exocytosis in Micropatterned Cells
10:21

Quantifying Spatiotemporal Parameters of Cellular Exocytosis in Micropatterned Cells

Published on: September 16, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Object identification is impaired when items are closely spaced, a phenomenon known as visual crowding.
  • Existing theories, spatial pooling and spatial substitution, predict different error patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the specific types of errors made during visual crowding.
  • To compare the predictive accuracy of different error models for crowding phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments manipulated flanker spacing, display eccentricity, and precueing duration.
  • Error patterns were compared against predictions from spatial pooling and independent intrusion models.

Main Results:

  • Both spatial intrusions and individual letter confusions significantly contribute to errors in crowded displays.
  • An independent intrusion model provided a better fit to the data than a naive pooling model.
  • Manipulating trial difficulty uniformly affected error distributions.

Conclusions:

  • Findings offer quantitative baselines for predictive models of visual crowding errors.
  • Distinguishing between pooling and spatial substitution models remains challenging.
  • Common mechanisms appear to underlie performance changes across various crowding manipulations.