Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

From Movements to Metrics: Evaluating Explainable AI Methods in Skeleton-Based Human Activity Recognition.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Same author

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Method to Predict Cerebral Palsy From Spontaneous Movements in Infants at High Risk.

JAMA network open·2022

Same author

Towards human-level performance on automatic pose estimation of infant spontaneous movements.

Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society·2021

Same author

Performance Analysis in Ski Jumping with a Differential Global Navigation Satellite System and Video-Based Pose Estimation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021

Same author

Classical Machine Learning Versus Deep Learning for the Older Adults Free-Living Activity Classification.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021

Same author

Predicting Advanced Balance Ability and Mobility with an Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Multifractal analyses of response time series: a comparative study.

Espen A F Ihlen¹

¹Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7489, Trondheim, Norway, espen.ihlen@ntnu.no.

Behavior Research Methods

|March 26, 2013

Summary

This study compares seven multifractal analyses for cognitive tasks. Results show each method has unique strengths and weaknesses regarding sample size, noise, and trends in response time series.

More Related Videos

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia

Published on: January 27, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia

Published on: January 27, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Quantitative Psychology
Data Analysis

Background:

Response time series in cognitive tasks often exhibit non-Gaussian distributions and long-range dependence.
Conventional monofractal analysis assumes Gaussian distribution and uses a single scaling exponent, which may not capture complex dynamics.
Multifractal analyses offer a more suitable approach for non-Gaussian response times by estimating a spectrum of scaling exponents.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the performance of seven different multifractal analyses.
To evaluate how well these multifractal methods perform with behavioral data, specifically response time series.
To provide a guideline for selecting appropriate multifractal analyses for behavioral data.

Main Methods:

Tested seven multifractal analyses on multiplicative cascading noise.
Generated time series with predefined multifractal spectra and intermittent variation mimicking response times.
Varied sample sizes (1,024 and 4,096) and included additive noise and multiharmonic trends at different magnitudes.

Main Results:

All seven multifractal analyses demonstrated individual advantages and disadvantages.
Performance was influenced by factors such as sample size, degree of multifractality, and the presence of noise and trends.
No single multifractal analysis was universally superior across all tested conditions.

Conclusions:

The choice of multifractal analysis depends on the specific characteristics of the response time series, including sample size and noise levels.
A comprehensive understanding of the pros and cons of each method is crucial for accurate analysis of behavioral data.
This comparison serves as a practical guide for researchers using multifractal analyses in psychology and other fields.