Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multi-species Conserved Sequences02:51

Multi-species Conserved Sequences

Next-generation sequencing technologies have created large genomic databases of a variety of animals and plants. Ever since the human genome project was completed, scientists studied the genome of primates, mammals, and other phylogenetically distant living beings. Such large-scale  studies have provided new insights into the evolutionary relationship between organisms.
Although the genome of each species varies greatly from each other, a few sequences are highly conserved. Such conserved DNA...
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

Overview
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MyD88 signaling in trophoblasts contributes to maternal high fat diet-associated alterations in placental gene expression and lipid profiles.

Placenta·2026
Same author

BCL6 regulates skeletal muscle mass and mitochondrial bioenergetics.

Molecular metabolism·2026
Same author

Implementation of Newborn Screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same author

In vivo functional profiling and structural characterization of the human <i>GLP1R</i> A316T variant.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Identification of Ephrin type-B receptor 4 as a critical mediator of tissue fibrosis.

JCI insight·2025
Same author

Structural basis of modified ligand selectivity from N-terminal PAC1R alternative splicing.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

Structural insights into mutated human phosphoglucomutase 1 (PGM1) using computational approaches.

Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics·2026
Same journal

Decrypting the allosteric network: multi-scale dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibition by <i>Moringa oleifera</i> flavonoids.

Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics·2026
Same journal

Anti-mycobacterial activity of phytocompounds from <i>Ricinus communis</i> L. - an integrated <i>in-vitro</i> and <i>in-silico</i> approach.

Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics·2026
Same journal

Binding studies of the X-ray characterized [SnMe<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>(Me<sub>2</sub>phen)] complex with human serum albumin: experimental and molecular docking approaches.

Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics·2026
Same journal

Computational design and experimental validation of peptide inhibitors to disrupt urease enzyme maturation in pathogenic bacteria <i>Proteus mirabilis</i>.

Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics·2026
Same journal

Wavelet-domain multiway spectral separation of free drug, DNA, and drug-DNA complex profiles for quantitative binding analysis based on fractional occupancy (<i>θ</i>).

Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

Identifying subset errors in multiple sequence alignments.

Aparna Roy1, Bruck Taddese, Shabana Vohra

  • 1a School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex , Wivenhoe Park, Colchester , CO4 3SQ , UK .

Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics
|March 27, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a simple method to detect errors in multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). The approach helps improve protein homology modeling, particularly for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).

More Related Videos

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • Assessing multiple sequence alignment (MSA) accuracy is crucial but lacks standardized methods.
  • Existing methods struggle to quantify the accuracy of different alignment algorithms.
  • Errors in MSAs, such as block shifts and residue misplacement, impact downstream applications like homology modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a straightforward method for detecting specific errors in MSAs.
  • To enhance the reliability of MSAs for applications such as protein homology modeling.
  • To highlight the relevance of this method for modeling protein loop regions and specific motifs in G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).

Main Methods:

  • Generating subsets of highly similar sequences from an MSA using a redundancy filter (70-90% sequence identity).
  • Identifying block shifts and misplacement of residues within gaps in these smaller, degenerate subsets.
  • Manual examination of subsets to detect alignment errors.

Main Results:

  • The developed method effectively detects block shifts and residue misplacements within gaps.
  • The approach is particularly useful for identifying minor errors associated with gaps in MSAs.
  • Demonstrated utility in analyzing the [K/R]KLH motif in G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method offers a simple yet effective way to evaluate MSA accuracy.
  • This technique improves the reliability of homology modeling, especially for protein loop regions.
  • The findings contribute to better understanding and modeling of GPCR structures and functions.