Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
A crossed random effects modeling approach for estimating diagnostic accuracy from ordinal ratings without a gold
Yunlong Xie1, Zhen Chen, Paul S Albert
1Division of Epidemiology Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, U.S.A.
Abstract:
In diagnostic studies without a gold standard, the assumption on the dependence structure of the multiple tests or raters plays an important role in model performance. In case of binary disease status, both conditional independence and crossed random effects structure have been proposed and their performance investigated. Less attention has been paid to the situation where the true disease status is ordinal. In this paper, we propose crossed subject-specific and rater-specific random effects to account for the dependence structure and assess the robustness of the proposed model to misspecification in the random effects distributions. We applied the models to data from the Physician Reliability Study, which focuses on assessing the diagnostic accuracy in a population of raters for the staging of endometriosis, a gynecological disorder in women. Using this new methodology, we estimate the probability of a correct classification and show that regional experts can more easily classify the intermediate stage than resident physicians.
Related Concept Videos
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Odds Ratio
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test
