Analytical performance validation of a coronary heart disease risk assessment multi-analyte proteomic test

Niamh Nolan1, Lilian Tee, Swathi Vijayakumar

  • 1Aviir, Inc., Irvine, CA 92618, USA.

Insights

A new multi-analyte immunoassay for coronary heart disease risk assessment (CHDRA) shows reliable analytical performance in clinical laboratory validation. This assay is robust against pre-analytical variations, improving risk prediction for intermediate-risk individuals.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular diagnostics
  • Biomarker assay development
  • Clinical laboratory science

Background:

  • Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains a significant public health concern, necessitating improved risk assessment strategies.
  • Current CHD risk assessment methods may not adequately identify individuals at intermediate risk.
  • A multi-analyte immunoassay-based algorithm, Coronary Heart Disease Risk Assessment (CHDRA), was developed to enhance risk stratification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a clinical laboratory validation of the analytical performance of the CHDRA biomarker assays.
  • To assess the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the CHDRA assays.
  • To evaluate the impact of pre-analytical variables on assay performance and CHD risk scores.

Main Methods:

  • Multiplexed immunoassay panels for seven CHDRA assays were evaluated using donor sera.
  • Analytical performance was assessed for specificity, sensitivity, interfering substances, and reproducibility.
  • The effects of pre-analytical specimen processing on assay results were investigated.

Main Results:

  • CHDRA panel proteins demonstrated acceptable accuracy (80-120%) and low cross-reactivity (<1%).
  • Assays showed minimal interference (<30%) from common substances and high reproducibility (<20% CV).
  • Pre-analytical variables did not significantly affect CHDRA scores, with recoveries within 80-120%.

Conclusions:

  • The CHDRA panel's analytical validation in a clinical laboratory meets established specifications.
  • Assay reproducibility across various test scenarios indicates robustness against pre-analytical and analytical variations.
  • The validated CHDRA assays are suitable for clinical use in improving CHD risk assessment.
Abstract