Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Effects of Blast-induced Neurotrauma on Pressurized Rodent Middle Cerebral Arteries
Published on: April 1, 2019
Predicting outcomes using the National Trauma Data Bank: optimum management of traumatic blunt carotid and blunt
Anahita Dua1, Sapan S Desai, SreyRam Kuy
1University of Texas at Houston, TX, USA.
Insights
For severe blunt thoracic trauma, endovascular repair offers survival benefits over open repair. For severe blunt carotid trauma, open surgery is superior to observation for survival.
Area of Science:
- Trauma Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Blunt thoracic and carotid trauma represent significant challenges in trauma care.
- Understanding national incidence and survival outcomes is crucial for optimizing patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the incidence of blunt thoracic and carotid trauma nationally.
- To compare survival outcomes based on different treatment approaches for these injuries.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) for the year 2008.
- Identified vascular traumas using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes.
- Specifically identified 178 blunt thoracic aortic and 313 blunt carotid injuries.
Main Results:
- A total of 2089 vascular traumas were analyzed.
- Patients with high Injury Severity Score (ISS) blunt thoracic trauma (61-75) showed improved survival with endovascular management versus observation (P < .05).
- Patients with high ISS blunt carotid trauma (61-75) demonstrated better survival with open surgery compared to observation (P < .01).
Conclusions:
- Endovascular approaches may offer a survival advantage for patients with severe blunt thoracic trauma (ISS > 61) compared to open repair.
- Open surgical management appears to be more beneficial for patients with severe blunt carotid trauma (ISS > 61) than observation.
Introduction:
We used the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to examine the incidence of blunt thoracic and carotid trauma nationally and survival outcomes based on treatment approach.
Methods:
All vascular traumas were identified from the 2008 NTDB. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis coding was used to identify 178 blunt thoracic aortic injuries and 313 traumatic blunt carotid injuries.
Results:
In all, 2089 vascular traumas were identified. Patients with blunt thoracic trauma within the highest injury severity score (ISS) range (61-75) had a significant survival advantage when observation was compared with endovascular management (P < .05). In the carotid trauma cohort, those with the highest ISS range (61-75) had a significant survival advantage with open surgery compared with observation (P < .01).
Conclusion:
Patients with traumatic blunt thoracic injury and an ISS > 61 appeared to benefit from endovascular approaches compared with open management. Patients with blunt carotid trauma and an ISS > 61 appeared to benefit from open surgical management.
Related Concept Videos
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
