Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
Evaluating the athlete's claim of an unintentional positive urine drug test
1Student Health Services, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3204, USA. jeffrey.anderson@uconn.edu
Abstract:
During a urine drug testing program, an athlete may make a claim that the results of a positive test have arisen from factors that were out of his or her control, and therefore, he or she should not be held responsible for the results. Some of these claims may include classic claims of passive inhalation of marijuana smoke or ingestion of poppy seeds leading to positive tests. In addition, with the proliferation of nutritional supplements on the market, many athletes claim that they accidentally ingested a banned substance contained in one of these. It is important that any sports medicine physician involved with sports drug testing be informed of the data that either support or refute these claims and that he or she contribute to a program wherein adequate education and policy establishment help to limit the likelihood of such claims. This article will review the data to help address these claims.
Related Concept Videos
Urine Studies I: Urinalysis
Drug Excretion: Miscellaneous Routes
Drug Elimination by Renal Route: Tubular Reabsorption
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test

