Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Statistical challenges in the evaluation of treatments for small patient populations
Edward L Korn1, Lisa M McShane, Boris Freidlin
1Biometric Research Branch, MSC 9735, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Abstract:
The development of a new treatment typically involves evaluation of its efficacy in a large clinical trial in which patients are randomly assigned either the new treatment or the standard of care. Results from these large randomized clinical trials allow for a definitive and unbiased assessment of the clinical benefit of the new treatment over the standard one. For rare diseases or for small patient subgroups identified within the context of a common disease, it may not be possible to conduct a large randomized trial. In this Review, we discuss alternative clinical study designs and statistical challenges that arise when attempting to assure that study results yield robust conclusions about the safety and effectiveness of a new medical product.
Insights
For rare diseases, traditional large randomized clinical trials may be impossible. This review explores alternative study designs and statistical methods for evaluating new treatments in small populations.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Medical Research
- Drug Development
Background:
- Large randomized clinical trials are standard for assessing new treatment efficacy.
- These trials provide unbiased comparisons against standard care.
- Such trials are often infeasible for rare diseases or small patient subgroups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss alternative clinical study designs for rare diseases or small patient populations.
- To address the statistical challenges in evaluating new medical products in these contexts.
- To ensure robust conclusions on safety and effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- Review of alternative clinical study designs.
- Discussion of statistical methodologies for small sample sizes.
- Analysis of challenges in rare disease research.
Main Results:
- Alternative designs can yield robust conclusions when large trials are not feasible.
- Specific statistical approaches are necessary to address small sample sizes.
- Careful design is crucial for valid safety and effectiveness assessments.
Conclusions:
- Innovative clinical study designs are essential for rare disease research.
- Addressing statistical challenges is key to reliable treatment evaluation.
- Robust evidence can be generated even with limited patient numbers.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
