Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Cost-effectiveness analysis of coronary artery disease screening in HIV-infected men
Julia E H Nolte1, Till Neumann2, Jennifer M Manne3
1Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach Foundation-Institute for Health Systems Management, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Insights
Cardiac screening for HIV-positive men is clinically beneficial and cost-effective. Strategies like stress testing and CCTA offer good value, comparable to existing HIV care interventions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Health Economics
Background:
- HIV infection significantly increases the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Evaluating cost-effective screening strategies for CAD in HIV-positive men is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of different cardiac screening strategies for HIV-infected men at intermediate or higher risk of CAD.
- To compare no screening versus stress testing and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based screening approaches.
Main Methods:
- A lifetime microsimulation model was developed to simulate CAD incidence and progression in HIV-infected men.
- Input parameters were derived from HIV cohort studies and existing literature.
- Compared strategies included no screening, stress testing, and CCTA, with varying intervention protocols (medication vs. percutaneous coronary intervention).
Main Results:
- CCTA + medication strategy yielded the most quality-adjusted life days (19) per patient with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €34,887/QALY.
- Screening at higher risk thresholds and repeated screening (stress testing + medication every 5 years) improved cost-effectiveness.
- At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €83,000/QALY, implementing any CAD screening demonstrated a 75-95% probability of being cost-effective.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac screening for CAD in HIV-positive men is clinically beneficial.
- The cost-effectiveness ratios of these screening strategies are comparable to other accepted interventions within HIV care.
- Implementing CAD screening for at-risk HIV-positive men represents a valuable healthcare investment.
Background:
HIV-infected patients are at increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of cardiac screening for HIV-positive men at intermediate or greater CAD risk.
Design:
We developed a lifetime microsimulation model of CAD incidence and progression in HIV-infected men.
Methods:
Input parameters were derived from two HIV cohort studies and the literature. We compared no CAD screening with stress testing and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based strategies. Patients with test results indicating 3-vessel/left main CAD underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and received coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In the stress testing + medication and CCTA + medication strategies, patients with 1-2-vessel CAD results received lifetime medical treatment without further diagnostics whereas in the stress testing + intervention and CCTA + intervention strategies, patients with these results underwent ICA and received percutaneous coronary intervention.
Results:
Compared to no screening, the stress testing + medication, stress testing + intervention, CCTA + medication, and CCTA + intervention strategies resulted in 14, 11, 19, and 14 quality-adjusted life days per patient and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 49,261, 57,817, 34,887 and 56,518 Euros per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), respectively. Screening only at higher CAD risk thresholds was more cost-effective. Repeated screening was clinically beneficial compared to one-time screening, but only stress testing + medication every 5 years remained cost-effective. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 83,000 €/QALY (∼ 100,000 US$/QALY), implementing any CAD screening was cost-effective with a probability of 75-95%.
Conclusions:
Screening HIV-positive men for CAD would be clinically beneficial and comes at a cost-effectiveness ratio comparable to other accepted interventions in HIV care.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
