Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
A comparative analysis of paediatric dose-finding trials of molecularly targeted agent with adults' trials
Xavier Paoletti1, Birgit Geoerger, François Doz
1Biostatistics department, Institut Curie, Paris, France. xavier.paoletti@curie.net
Insights
Paediatric dose-finding trials for molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) may not always be necessary. Alternative early-phase trials can accelerate drug development in paediatric oncology while managing toxicity.
Area of Science:
- Paediatric Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Drug Development
Background:
- Dose-finding phase I trials in children typically follow adult data accumulation.
- Investigating the role of paediatric dose-finding trials for molecularly targeted agents (MTAs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the necessity and role of paediatric dose-finding trials for MTAs.
- To compare paediatric recommended phase II doses (RPIID) with adult BSA-adjusted doses.
Main Methods:
- Reviewed phase I paediatric oncology trials of MTAs approved in adults before June 2012.
- Compared paediatric RPIID to BSA-adjusted adult doses and analyzed toxicity profiles.
Main Results:
- 15 MTAs were evaluated in 19 paediatric phase I trials.
- 70% of trials had paediatric RPIIDs between 90-130% of BSA-adjusted adult doses.
- 63% of children received suboptimal doses, with similar safety profiles to adults.
Conclusions:
- Dose-finding studies may not be required for all MTAs in children.
- Early-phase trials validating adult data (PK, PD, efficacy) while monitoring toxicity can accelerate paediatric drug development, especially for agents with a wide therapeutic index.
Background:
Dose-finding phase I trials in children are usually carried out once clinical data have already been accumulated in the adult population. The objectives, place and role of paediatric dose-finding trials are investigated in the era of molecularly targeted agents (MTAs).
Methods:
Phase I paediatric oncology trials of MTAs approved in adults before June 15th, 2012 were reviewed. The recommended phase II dose (RPIID) was compared to the body surface area (BSA)-adjusted approved dose in adults. Toxicity profile was compared to the findings from the corresponding adult phase I trials.
Results:
Fifteen MTAs out of a total of 25 MTAs approved in the adult population have been evaluated in 19 single-agent phase I paediatric trials. Trials included a median of 30 children with a median of four dose levels. The paediatric RPIID ranged between 90% and 130% of the BSA-adjusted approved dose in adults for 70% of the trials (75% of compounds). Overall, 63% of children did not receive an optimal dose. The most marked discrepancy involved sunitinib. Safety profiles described in phase I paediatric trials were usually similar to those reported in the adult population.
Conclusions:
These data suggest that dose-finding studies might not be necessary for all the MTAs in children. Except in the case of a narrow therapeutic index, early-phase trials validating pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic markers and efficacy findings from adults while controlling for toxicity appear to be a possible alternative to accelerate drug development in paediatric oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview

