Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Measuring Lactase Enzymatic Activity in the Teaching Lab
Published on: August 6, 2018
Lactase treated feeds to promote growth and feeding tolerance in preterm infants
Cherrie Rose Y Tan-Dy1, Arne Ohlsson
1Pediatrix Medical Group Washington, Renton, Washington, USA. cherrie_tan-dy@pediatrix.com.
Insights
Adding lactase to milk did not significantly benefit preterm infants in the single trial reviewed. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness and safety of lactase for promoting growth and feeding tolerance in premature infants.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal nutrition
- Gastroenterology
- Pediatric research
Background:
- Preterm infants often struggle with lactose digestion due to immature lactase activity.
- Lactose malabsorption can hinder successful transition to enteral feedings and impact growth.
- Lactase supplementation may help preterm infants digest lactose in breast milk and formula.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adding lactase to milk for preterm infants.
- To assess lactase's impact on growth promotion and feeding tolerance compared to placebo or no intervention.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials was conducted.
- Searches included major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL) up to May 2012.
- One high-quality, double-blind randomized controlled trial involving 130 preterm infants was included.
Main Results:
- The single included study found no statistically significant effect of lactase on overall weight gain.
- A non-significant reduction in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was observed (RR 0.32).
- A statistically significant increase in weight gain was noted at study day 10, but not at other time points; no adverse effects were reported.
Conclusions:
- Current evidence from one trial suggests no significant benefit of adding lactase to feeds for preterm infants.
- Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to establish the effectiveness and safety of lactase supplementation.
- Future research should focus on infants at the introduction of enteral feeds and include predefined primary and secondary outcomes.
Background:
Successful transition from parenteral nutrition to full enteral feedings during the immediate neonatal period is associated with improved growth in preterm infants. Lactase is the last of the major intestinal disaccharidases to develop in preterm infants. Because of inadequate lactase activity, preterm infants are unable to digest lactose. Lactase preparations could potentially be used to hydrolyse lactose in formulas and breast milk to minimize lactose malabsorption in preterm infants.
Objectives:
To assess the effectiveness and safety of the addition of lactase to milk compared to placebo or no intervention for the promotion of growth and feeding tolerance in preterm infants.
Primary Outcomes:
weight gain expressed as grams/kg/day, growth expressed as weight, length and head circumference percentile for postmenstrual age (PMA), assessed at birth and at 40 weeks PMA, days to achieve full enteral feeds.
Secondary Outcomes:
several common outcomes associated with preterm birth, and adverse effects.
Search Methods:
Electronic and manual searches were conducted in January 2005 of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, 2004, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to Jan 2005), EMBASE (1980 to Jan 2005) and CINAHL (1982 to Jan 2005), personal files, bibliographies of identified trials and abstracts by the Pediatric Academic Societies' Meetings and the European Society of Pediatric Research Meetings published in Pediatric Research. The searches were repeated in May 2012 of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and abstracts from the Pediatric Academic Societies' Annual Meetings from 2000 to 2012 (Abstracts2View). The Web of Science was searched using the only previously identified trial by Erasmus 2002 as the starting point to search for additional trials that cited this trial.
Selection Criteria:
Types of studies: randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials.
Participants:
preterm infants < 37 weeks PMA.
Intervention:
addition of lactase to milk versus placebo or no intervention.
Data Collection And Analysis:
The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were followed independently by the review authors to assess study quality and report outcomes. Treatment effects, calculated using Review Manager 5, included risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed-effect model was used for meta-analyses. We did not perform heterogeneity tests as only one study was identified.
Main Results:
The repeat searches conducted in May 2012 did not identify any additional studies for inclusion. One study enrolling 130 infants of 26 to 34 weeks PMA (mean postnatal age at entry 11 days) was identified and no identified study was excluded. The study was a double blind randomized controlled trial of high quality. Lactase treated feeds were initiated when enteral feedings provided > 75% of daily intake. None of the primary outcomes outlined in the protocol for this review and only one of the secondary outcomes, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were reported on. The RR for NEC was 0.32 (95% CI 0.01 to 7.79); the RD was -0.02 (95% CI -0.06 to 0.03) (a reduction which was not statistically significant). There was a statistically significant increase in weight gain at study day 10 in the lactase treated feeds group but not at any other time points. Overall, there was not a statistically significant effect on weight gain. No adverse effects were noted.
Authors' Conclusions:
The only randomized trial to date provides no evidence of significant benefit to preterm infants from adding lactase to their feeds. Further research regarding effectiveness and safety are required before practice recommendations can be made. Randomized controlled trials comparing lactase versus placebo treated feeds and enrolling infants when enteral feeds are introduced are required. The primary and secondary outcomes for effectiveness and safety should include those identified in this review.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Development of Human Microbiota
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Microbes in Food Production

