Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Probiotic Studies in Neonatal Mice Using Gavage
Published on: January 27, 2019
Prebiotics in infants for prevention of allergy
David A Osborn1, John K H Sinn
1CentralClinical School,Discipline ofObstetrics,Gynaecology andNeonatology,University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. david.osborn@email.cs.nsw.gov.au.
Insights
Prebiotics in infant formula may reduce eczema risk but do not significantly impact asthma. Further research is needed to confirm benefits for allergy prevention in all infants.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Pediatrics
- Nutrition
Background:
- Prebiotics, such as oligosaccharides, are added to infant formulas.
- These prebiotics may prevent infants from developing allergies to dietary components.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of prebiotic supplementation in infant formula for allergy prevention.
- To determine the impact of prebiotics on the incidence of allergic diseases in infants.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.
- Searched multiple databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE up to August 2012.
- Included studies compared prebiotic supplementation versus no prebiotic or different prebiotic types in infants.
Main Results:
- Four studies with 1428 infants were eligible; all had a high risk of attrition bias.
- Meta-analysis of two studies showed no significant difference in infant asthma.
- Meta-analysis of four studies revealed a significant reduction in eczema incidence (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97).
Conclusions:
- Prebiotic supplements may offer some protection against eczema in formula-fed infants.
- Insufficient evidence exists to recommend routine prebiotic use for allergy prevention in all infants.
- Further research is required to clarify optimal use in high-risk versus low-risk populations and for other allergic conditions.
Background:
Prebiotics (commonly oligosaccharides) added to infant feeds have the potential to prevent sensitisation of infants to dietary allergens.
Objectives:
To determine the effect of prebiotic given to infants for the prevention of allergy.
Search Methods:
We performed an updated search in August 2012 of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 8), MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, citations, expert informants and clinical trials registries.
Selection Criteria:
Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared the use of a prebiotic to no prebiotic, or a specific prebiotic compared to a different prebiotic in infants for prevention of allergy.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Assessment of trial quality, data extraction and synthesis of data were performed using the standard methods of The Cochrane Collaboration.
Main Results:
The 2012 update identified 13 studies classified as ongoing or awaiting classification (yet to report allergy outcomes). Forty-three studies were excluded, primarily as no allergy data were reported, although none of these enrolled infants were at high risk of allergy. Four studies enrolling 1428 infants were eligible for inclusion. All studies were at high risk of attrition bias. Allergy outcomes were reported from four months to two years of age.Meta-analysis of two studies (226 infants) found no significant difference in infant asthma although significant heterogeneity was found between studies. Meta-analysis of four studies found a significant reduction in eczema (1218 infants, typical risk ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.97; typical risk difference -0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.00; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 25, 95% CI 14 to > 100; P = 0.03). No statistically significant heterogeneity was found between studies. One study reported no significant difference in urticaria.No statistically significant subgroup differences were found according to infant risk of allergy or type of infant feed. However, individual studies reported a significant reduction in asthma and eczema from supplementation with a mixture of galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharide (GOS/FOS 9:1 ratio) (8 g/L) in infants at high risk of allergy; and in eczema from supplementation with GOS/FOS (9:1) (6.8 g/L) and acidic oligosacccharide (1.2 g/L) in infants not selected for allergy risk.
Authors' Conclusions:
Further research is needed before routine use of prebiotics can be recommended for prevention of allergy in formula fed infants. There is some evidence that a prebiotic supplement added to infant feeds may prevent eczema. It is unclear whether the use of prebiotic should be restricted to infants at high risk of allergy or may have an effect in low risk populations; or whether it may have an effect on other allergic diseases including asthma.
More Related Videos
05:31Noninvasive Sampling of Mucosal Lining Fluid for the Quantification of In Vivo Upper Airway Immune-mediator Levels
Published on: August 7, 2017
09:36Effect of Hyaluronic Acid 35 kDa on an In Vitro Model of Preterm Small Intestinal Injury and Healing Using Enteroid-Derived Monolayers
Published on: July 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Development of Human Microbiota
Probiotics
Development of Immunocompetence
The initial cells that migrate from the fetal thymus settle within the skin and epithelial tissues lining the mouth, digestive tract, and in females, the uterus and vagina. These cells, including skin-based dendritic cells, serve as antigen-presenting cells, playing a key role in T cell activation.
Subsequent T...
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Allergic Reactions