Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
When interference helps: increasing executive load to facilitate deception detection in the concealed information
George Visu-Petra1, Mihai Varga, Mircea Miclea
1Applied Cognitive Psychology Center, Department of Psychology, Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Increasing executive load during a Concealed Information Test (CIT) did not improve individual detection accuracy. While dual-tasking showed larger reaction time differences, it did not enhance the overall effectiveness of this deception detection method.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Forensic Science
Background:
- The Concealed Information Test (CIT) is a method for detecting deception by assessing differential psychophysiological responses to crime-relevant information.
- Executive functions, such as attention and working memory, are hypothesized to play a role in the CIT's effectiveness.
- Increasing cognitive load through dual-task paradigms is a common method to investigate the involvement of executive functions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether increasing executive load by concurrently performing memory or set-shifting tasks enhances the detection efficiency of a reaction time-based CIT.
- To examine the impact of dual-tasking on the concealed information effect and overall diagnostic accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Participants underwent a mock crime scenario and then completed three reaction time-based CIT conditions: a single-task CIT, a CIT with a concurrent memory task (CITMem), and a CIT with a concurrent set-shifting task (CITShift).
- Reaction times (RTs) and response accuracy for probe (relevant) and irrelevant stimuli were recorded.
- Signal detection theory parameters were used to assess discrimination accuracy against a simulated innocent group.
Main Results:
- The concealed information effect (increased RT and decreased accuracy for probe items) was observed in all three conditions.
- Dual-task conditions showed a larger difference in RTs between probe and irrelevant items, but this did not translate to significantly improved individual detection efficiency.
- Accurate discrimination was achieved across all conditions, with the CITMem condition showing the highest overall accuracy and the smallest accuracy difference between probe and irrelevant items.
Conclusions:
- While dual-tasking increases cognitive load and influences responses to CIT stimuli, it does not significantly enhance the individual-level detection efficiency of the reaction time-based CIT.
- Executive functions appear to be involved in processing CIT stimuli, as evidenced by performance on concurrent tasks.
- Further research is needed to understand the complex interplay between cognitive load, executive functions, and deception detection accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Cause and Effect
Persuasion Strategies
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Social Facilitation

