Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Use of Cognitive Aids to Assist With the Resuscitation of Emergency Department Patients: A Scoping Review.

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA·2026
Same author

Improving patient safety governance and systems through learning from successes and failures: qualitative surveys and interviews with international experts.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2023
Same author

The role of frailty risk for fracture-related hospital readmission and mortality after a hip fracture.

Archives of gerontology and geriatrics·2023
Same author

Systems archetypes to investigate the unintended consequences of telehealth in rural Australia: A systems thinking approach to telehealth evaluation and policymaking.

The International journal of health planning and management·2023
Same author

Built to last? Barriers and facilitators of healthcare program sustainability: a systematic integrative review.

Implementation science : IS·2023
Same author

Beyond the aspirational: creating the future of health care in Australia.

Internal medicine journal·2023
Same journal

The Right to Play in Paediatric Healthcare: Policy and Practice in Chile.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
Same journal

Also a feeling-how frontline health care professionals construct patient safety.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
Same journal

Exploring quality and patient safety competencies and competency frameworks: a scoping review.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
Same journal

Operational inefficiency and perceived quality in a Paediatric Day Hospital: a Lean-informed study of patient flow, caregiver and staff perceptions.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
Same journal

From compliance to prediction: Clinical Laboratories as digital infrastructure for health-system quality and safety.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
Same journal

The four main domains of the concept of return-on-investment from healthcare quality improvement programmes.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
09:52

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

Classroom and simulation team training: a randomized controlled trial.

Robyn Clay-Williams1, Catherine A McIntosh, Ross Kerridge

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. r.clay-williams@unsw.edu.au

International Journal for Quality in Health Care : Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
|April 4, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Classroom-based crew resource management (CRM) training improved clinician knowledge and teamwork behavior. However, adding simulation-based training did not provide further benefits, contrary to hypotheses.

Keywords:
competency-based educationcrew resource managementneeds assessmentteamwork

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
09:52

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare education and training
  • Medical teamwork and patient safety
  • Human factors in medicine

Background:

  • Crew Resource Management (CRM) training is crucial for improving teamwork and safety in high-risk professions.
  • Previous research suggests both classroom and simulation-based training enhance teamwork, but their combined effect needs further investigation.
  • Understanding the optimal training modality for healthcare professionals is essential for effective team performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of classroom and simulation-based CRM training on teamwork attitudes and behaviors.
  • To determine if a combination of classroom and simulation training offers synergistic improvements.
  • To test hypotheses regarding the impact of different CRM training interventions on healthcare teams.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 157 doctors, nurses, and midwives in Australia.
  • Participants were assigned to four groups: classroom-only CRM training, simulation-based CRM training, combined training, or a control group.
  • Quantitative measures of teamwork attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors were assessed pre- and post-intervention.

Main Results:

  • Classroom-only CRM training led to significant improvements in clinician knowledge and observed teamwork behaviors compared to the control group.
  • No significant improvements in teamwork attitudes were observed across any of the intervention groups.
  • The combined classroom and simulation training group did not show additional benefits over classroom-only training.

Conclusions:

  • Classroom-based CRM training alone can effectively enhance clinician knowledge and teamwork behaviors.
  • Simulation-based training, when added to classroom instruction, did not yield further improvements in the studied outcomes.
  • The findings suggest that traditional classroom CRM training may be sufficient for improving certain teamwork aspects in healthcare.