Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions01:24

Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions

Intermittent intravenous (IV) infusion is a method of drug administration where medications are delivered over short infusion periods followed by intervals of no drug delivery. This approach helps to prevent sustained high drug concentrations in the bloodstream, reducing the risk of adverse effects associated with prolonged exposure. Unlike continuous infusion, steady-state concentrations may not be achieved during a single dosing cycle but can be reached through repeated...
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy01:30

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy, also known as CRRT, is a procedural treatment for acute kidney injury (AKI) that gradually removes uremic toxins and fluids while maintaining acid-base balance and stabilizing electrolytes. It is particularly useful for hemodynamically unstable patients. Unlike intermittent hemodialysis, which is faster, CRRT provides a gentler approach over 24 hours, closely mimicking the function of natural kidneys. However, CRRT is not ideal for patients with...
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy01:26

Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) is an essential intervention for patients experiencing severe kidney dysfunction. This therapy offers a continuous mechanism for removing fluids and toxins from the bloodstream, leveraging the patient’s blood pressure to facilitate filtration through a specialized filter. This method contrasts with intermittent dialysis, providing a gentler and more consistent removal of waste products and excess fluid, which is particularly beneficial in critically...
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
Oral Drug Delivery Systems: Continuous-Release Systems01:26

Oral Drug Delivery Systems: Continuous-Release Systems

Continuous-release drug delivery systems offer a strategic approach to maintaining therapeutic drug levels over extended periods following oral administration. By modulating the release rate of active pharmaceutical ingredients, these systems minimize fluctuations in plasma concentrations, which enhances clinical efficacy and reduces the need for frequent dosing. Such characteristics make them particularly advantageous in managing chronic diseases where patient adherence and stable drug...
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters01:01

Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters

It is not uncommon for complete drug pharmacokinetic profiles to remain elusive in pharmacokinetics. This necessitates certain educated assumptions by pharmacokineticists to determine appropriate dosage regimens without comprehensive pharmacokinetic data from animal or human studies. One prevalent assumption is setting the bioavailability factor, denoted as F, to 1 or 100%. This assumption caters to the scenario where a drug doesn't achieve full systemic absorption, resulting in the patient...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proliferation- and cytotoxic immune signatures identify chemotherapy-responsive bladder tumors in a molecular subtype dependent manner.

NPJ precision oncology·2026
Same author

Polygenic risk score with KLK3 SNP-SNP interaction pairs for predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Estimating the Effect of Finasteride on Kallikrein Marker Levels in Blood and the Use of Converted Markers in the Four-Kallikrein Model.

European urology focus·2026
Same author

Clinical Trial in Progress: SWOG S2210, a Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant Carboplatin for Localized High-risk Prostate Cancer with Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations.

European urology focus·2025
Same author

Red meat intake interacts with a TGF-β-pathway-based polygenic risk score to impact colorectal cancer risk: Application of a novel approach for polygenic risk score construction.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Emerging Strategies for Drug-Based Cancer Risk Reduction.

American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
07:25

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Published on: March 6, 2018

Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer.

Maha Hussain1, Catherine M Tangen, Donna L Berry

  • 1University of Michigan, Division of Hematology/Oncology, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., 7314 CC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0946, USA. mahahuss@umich.edu

The New England Journal of Medicine
|April 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study found intermittent androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer did not prove non-inferior to continuous therapy for survival. While quality of life improved short-term, long-term survival outcomes remain inconclusive.

More Related Videos

Murine Prostate Micro-dissection and Surgical Castration
08:49

Murine Prostate Micro-dissection and Surgical Castration

Published on: May 11, 2016

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
05:19

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance

Published on: November 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
07:25

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Published on: March 6, 2018

Murine Prostate Micro-dissection and Surgical Castration
08:49

Murine Prostate Micro-dissection and Surgical Castration

Published on: May 11, 2016

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
05:19

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance

Published on: November 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Urology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) frequently develops castration resistance under androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT).
  • Hypotheses suggest that modulating androgen levels before disease progression may extend the duration of androgen dependence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) is non-inferior to continuous androgen deprivation (CAD) in prolonging survival for mHSPC patients.
  • To assess differences in quality of life (QoL) between IAD and CAD groups.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized trial involving 1535 mHSPC patients with PSA levels ≥5 ng/mL after initial 7-month ADT.
  • Patients were stratified and assigned to either IAD or CAD, with survival and QoL as coprimary endpoints.
  • Median follow-up was 9.8 years, with a non-inferiority margin of a hazard ratio of 1.20 for death with IAD.

Main Results:

  • Median survival was 5.8 years for CAD versus 5.1 years for IAD (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.99-1.23), indicating statistical inconclusiveness regarding non-inferiority.
  • IAD showed transient improvements in erectile function and mental health at 3 months post-randomization.
  • No significant differences in high-grade adverse events were observed between the groups.

Conclusions:

  • The study could not definitively establish non-inferiority of IAD to CAD for survival in mHSPC due to statistical limitations.
  • While IAD offered minor short-term QoL benefits, the risk of increased mortality with IAD cannot be excluded.
  • Further research is needed to clarify the optimal ADT strategy for mHSPC.