Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Indoor and outdoor fine particulate matter and carbon monoxide concentrations in homes of infants in Nairobi, Kenya.

PLOS global public health·2026
Same author

Air pollution exposures in early life and brain development in children (ABC): protocol for a pregnancy cohort study.

BMJ paediatrics open·2025
Same author

Integrated hepatic transcriptomics and metabolomics identify Pck1 as a key factor in the broad dysregulation induced by vehicle pollutants.

Particle and fibre toxicology·2024
Same author

Indoor Air Quality Intervention in Schools: Effectiveness of a Portable HEPA Filter Deployment in Five Schools Impacted by Roadway and Aircraft Pollution Sources.

Atmosphere·2024
Same author

Coarse Particulate Matter and Markers of Inflammation and Coagulation in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Population: A Repeat Measures Analysis.

Environmental health perspectives·2024
Same author

Association between Airport Ultrafine Particles and Lung Cancer Risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
10:29

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers

Published on: March 21, 2016

Estimating air chemical emissions from research activities using stack measurement data.

Marcel Y Ballinger1, Cheryl J Duchsherer, Rodger K Woodruff

  • 1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Battelle Seattle Research Center Seattle, Washington, USA. marcel.ballinger@pnnl.gov

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)
|April 6, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Estimating air emissions from research and development (R&D) is challenging. A Monte Carlo technique using stack measurements quantified low emissions and release fractions, revealing complexities in R&D emission estimations.

More Related Videos

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Lab-Scale Model to Evaluate Odor and Gas Concentrations Emitted by Deep Bedded Pack Manure
06:52

Lab-Scale Model to Evaluate Odor and Gas Concentrations Emitted by Deep Bedded Pack Manure

Published on: July 19, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
10:29

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers

Published on: March 21, 2016

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Lab-Scale Model to Evaluate Odor and Gas Concentrations Emitted by Deep Bedded Pack Manure
06:52

Lab-Scale Model to Evaluate Odor and Gas Concentrations Emitted by Deep Bedded Pack Manure

Published on: July 19, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Occupational Health

Background:

  • Current methods for estimating air emissions from research and development (R&D) activities rely on diverse release fractions or emission factors.
  • Existing methods lack reported uncertainties and confidence levels, despite being considered conservative.
  • Chemical emissions from R&D facilities are difficult to quantify due to the dynamic nature of research and the wide variety of chemicals used in small quantities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a robust method for estimating chemical air emissions from R&D facilities.
  • To quantify low-level emissions and estimate release fractions using empirical data.
  • To assess the correlation between release fractions and chemical properties or inventory.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Monte Carlo technique to analyze 10 years of sampling data from four research facilities.
  • Created annual emission estimate distributions for target compounds, accounting for detection frequency.
  • Calculated release fractions using chemical usage and standing inventory, applying filters for realistic values (0-1).

Main Results:

  • Monte Carlo analysis without filtering showed emission distributions often spanning zero, with 40% having negative means, indicating emissions below background levels.
  • Applying a filter for positive emission values increased the mean estimate by an average of 16%.
  • Release fractions varied widely across chemicals and facilities; regressions against molecular weight, vapor pressure, and inventory showed weak correlations.

Conclusions:

  • Air emissions from R&D operations are inherently difficult to estimate accurately.
  • The Monte Carlo technique provides a viable method for quantifying low emissions and estimating release fractions from R&D activities.
  • The lack of strong correlations confirms the complexity and variability in estimating R&D emissions, highlighting the need for refined methodologies.