Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...

False Memories

False Memories

False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...

Interference and Decay

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Impaired Tone-in-Noise Detection in Individuals Who Report Temporary Hearing Symptoms After Noise Exposure.

Ear and hearing·2026

Same author

Development of a rapid automated binaural detection task.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025

Same author

FORUM: Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022

Same author

A Novel Intervention Platform for Service Members With Subjective Cognitive Complaints: Implementation, Patient Participation, and Satisfaction.

Military medicine·2020

Same author

Predicting Speech-in-Noise Deficits from the Audiogram.

Ear and hearing·2019

Same author

The role of response bias in perceptual learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2015

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

Compensating for identification errors in memory recall tasks.

Daniel E Shub¹

¹School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom. Daniel.Shub@nottingham.ac.uk

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

|April 6, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a mathematical model for memory recall, showing how identification and recall errors impact performance. Understanding these errors is crucial for accurate memory estimation in cognitive research.

More Related Videos

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotional Autobiographical Recollection

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotional Autobiographical Recollection

Published on: August 26, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotional Autobiographical Recollection

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotional Autobiographical Recollection

Published on: August 26, 2011

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Mathematical Modeling
Neuroscience

Background:

Memory recall tasks are fundamental in cognitive psychology.
Estimating memory accuracy is often complicated by various error sources.
Previous models may not fully account for identification versus recall error contributions.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a mathematical model for approximating memory recall performance.
To differentiate the impact of identification errors and recall errors.
To highlight the significance of identification accuracy in memory estimation.

Main Methods:

Development of a novel mathematical model for list-item recall.
Formulation of probability calculations for correct recall and identification.
Analysis of the relationship between item independence and recall probability.

Main Results:

A probability formula was derived: P(correct recall) ≈ P(all items recalled) * [P(correct identification)]^N.
The model demonstrates that identification errors significantly influence overall recall accuracy.
The impact of identification errors increases exponentially with the number of items (N).

Conclusions:

The developed model provides a quantitative approach to understanding memory errors.
Accurate estimation of memory requires careful consideration of item identification processes.
Future research should incorporate this model to refine memory performance assessments.