Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reproducibility and action levels for gamma camera uniformity.

K C Young1, K Kouris, M Awdeh

  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat.

Nuclear Medicine Communications
|February 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Determining gamma camera uniformity action levels is challenging. This study found corrected relative standard deviation (CRSD) to be a more reproducible and reliable quality control parameter than integral uniformity (IU) or differential uniformity (DU).

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Site-specific associations of muscle thickness with bone mineral density in middle-aged and older men and women.

Physiology international·2017
Same author

Image processing can cause some malignant soft-tissue lesions to be missed in digital mammography images.

Clinical radiology·2017
Same author

Can the channelized Hotelling observer including aspects of the human visual system predict human observer performance in mammography?

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2017
Same author

Can the non-pre-whitening model observer, including aspects of the human visual system, predict human observer performance in mammography?

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2016
Same author

SIMULATING LOCAL DENSE AREAS USING PMMA TO ASSESS AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2016
Same author

Commentary on: A comparison of two digital mammography systems: are there any differences?

Clinical radiology·2015

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Physics
  • Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • Quality Control in Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Establishing action levels for gamma camera non-uniformity is hindered by unknown reproducibilities of quality control measurements and service adjustments.
  • Integral uniformity (IU) and differential uniformity (DU) are common metrics, but their reliability in routine quality control is questionable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reproducibility of integral uniformity (IU), differential uniformity (DU), and corrected relative standard deviation (CRSD) for gamma cameras.
  • To compare the relative sensitivity and precision of service adjustments for these uniformity parameters.
  • To define general action levels for IU, DU, and CRSD based on reproducibility and sensitivity.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed reproducibility of IU, DU, and CRSD using 10 intrinsic flood acquisitions at varying total counts (2, 5, 10, 30 million).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed relative sensitivity by comparing monthly measurements of IU, DU, and CRSD on 10 gamma cameras over one year.
  • Evaluated service adjustment precision by measuring uniformity on 10 gamma cameras monthly post-adjustment.

    • Main Results:

    • CRSD demonstrated superior consistency and reproducibility across all count densities compared to IU and DU.
    • At 10 million counts, CRSD had a coefficient of variation (COV) of 1.3%, a five-fold improvement over IU (6.6%) and DU (6.1%).
    • No significant difference in relative sensitivity was found between IU, DU, and CRSD; all parameters reflected camera performance changes similarly.
    • General action levels were defined: 7% for IU, 5% for DU, and 2.5% for CRSD.

    Conclusions:

    • Corrected relative standard deviation (CRSD) is a more reproducible and reliable metric for gamma camera uniformity quality control than IU or DU.
    • The defined action levels provide a standardized framework for assessing and maintaining gamma camera performance.
    • CRSD offers a significant improvement in quality control precision, aiding in more accurate service adjustments and consistent imaging performance.