Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions

Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions

When measuring distances in areas with physical obstructions, such as a lake in a field, surveyors must employ techniques to calculate accurate lengths without direct line measurements. One effective method is the offset technique, which allows for precise distance estimation over inaccessible stretches.In this scenario, a surveyor must measure a side of an area that crosses a lake. Since the measuring tape cannot span the lake, the surveyor begins by establishing a baseline that aligns with...

Distance Corrections

Distance Corrections

To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effects of glucose and insulin on HepG2-C3A cell metabolism.

Biotechnology and bioengineering·2010

Same author

Overexpression of antioxidant enzymes upregulates aryl hydrocarbon receptor expression via increased Sp1 DNA-binding activity.

Free radical biology & medicine·2010

Same author

Impact of hepatitis C viral replication on CD4+ T-lymphocyte progression in HIV-HCV coinfection before and after antiretroviral therapy.

AIDS (London, England)·2010

Same author

[Expression and diagnostic significance of CD34 in brain tumors of patients with refractory epilepsy].

Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi = Chinese journal of pathology·2010

Same author

Characterization of pore-expanded amino-functionalized mesoporous silicas directly synthesized with dimethyldecylamine and its application for decolorization of sulphonated azo dyes.

Journal of hazardous materials·2010

Same author

Human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) expression in cervical lesions: association with cancer progression, HPV 16/18 infection, and host immune response.

Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)·2010

Same journal

The grand rapids dip could it be real?

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026

Same journal

A temporal causal deep learning for real-time traffic risk prediction on freeway merging areas.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026

Same journal

Modeling road-segment-level speeding risk of new energy vehicle taxis using a multistage framework with spatial spillover, endogeneity, and nonlinear effects.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026

Same journal

Role of streetscape feature in pedestrian safety: A modified multi-level multiple membership model.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026

Same journal

Assessing autonomous driving performance and environmental influencing factors using real-world operational trajectory data.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026

Same journal

Multi-scale modeling of electric vehicle fatal crash risk: uncovering spatial heterogeneity and infrastructure-land use coupling mechanisms.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

Modeling work zone crash frequency by quantifying measurement errors in work zone length.

Hong Yang¹, Kaan Ozbay, Ozgur Ozturk

¹Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems (RITS) Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers University, 96 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States. yanghong@rci.rutgers.edu

Accident; Analysis and Prevention

|April 9, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Improving work zone safety is crucial. A new measurement error model integrated with the negative binomial model accurately estimates crash risk, unlike traditional methods that overestimate work zone length effects.

More Related Videos

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling

Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling

Published on: August 5, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling

Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling

Published on: August 5, 2016

Area of Science:

Transportation Engineering
Traffic Safety Research
Statistical Modeling

Background:

Work zones present significant safety challenges for traffic engineers.
Accurate risk factor assessment is vital for effective traffic management.
Measurement errors in variables, like work zone length, can compromise safety models.

Purpose of the Study:

To address the challenge of measurement errors in work zone safety evaluation.
To propose an improved crash frequency (CF) modeling approach.
To compare the performance of the proposed model against traditional methods.

Main Methods:

Estimation of a crash frequency (CF) model to identify risk factors.
Integration of a measurement error (ME) model with the negative binomial (NB) model.
Utilizing a dataset of 60 work zones in New Jersey for model estimation.

Main Results:

The proposed ME-NB model demonstrated superior goodness-of-fit compared to the traditional NB model.
The traditional NB approach was found to overestimate the impact of work zone length on crash occurrence.
The improved approach provides more reliable estimates for work zone safety analysis.

Conclusions:

The integrated ME-NB model offers a more accurate method for assessing work zone safety.
Accounting for measurement errors, particularly in work zone length, is essential for reliable safety evaluations.
This research contributes to enhancing traffic safety strategies in construction zones.