Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He mathematically...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Existence of processes violating causal inequalities on time-delocalised subsystems.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Semi-Device-Independent Certification of Causal Nonseparability with Trusted Quantum Inputs.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Entanglement Swapping and Quantum Correlations via Symmetric Joint Measurements.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Quantum Fisher Information from Randomized Measurements.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Bilocal Bell Inequalities Violated by the Quantum Elegant Joint Measurement.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Experimental test of local observer independence.

Science advances·2019
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

Error-tradeoff and error-disturbance relations for incompatible quantum measurements.

Cyril Branciard1

  • 1Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems and School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia. c.branciard@physics.uq.edu.au

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|April 9, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study quantifies Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, showing an optimal tradeoff between errors when jointly approximating incompatible quantum measurements. It clarifies the disturbance caused by measuring one observable on another.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Physics
  • Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Background:

  • Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is central to quantum theory.
  • Standard uncertainty relations focus on outcome indeterminacy, not measurement disturbance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To precisely quantify Heisenberg's original intuition on measurement disturbance.
  • To establish a quantitative relationship for the tradeoff between errors in joint measurements of incompatible observables.

Main Methods:

  • Developing a theoretical framework to approximate joint measurements of incompatible observables.
  • Deriving a tight mathematical relation for the error-disturbance tradeoff.

Main Results:

  • A precise quantification of Heisenberg's error-disturbance intuition is presented.
  • An optimal tradeoff relation between errors for approximating joint measurements is established.
  • A stronger error-disturbance relation is derived for sequential measurements.

Conclusions:

  • The findings provide a more accurate understanding of quantum measurement limitations.
  • This work offers a refined perspective on the interplay between measurement disturbance and uncertainty.