Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
Conservation of Declining Populations02:07

Conservation of Declining Populations

Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...
Conservation of Small Populations02:04

Conservation of Small Populations

Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less likely to...
What is Conservation Biology?01:57

What is Conservation Biology?

Conservation biology is a scientific field that focuses on the preservation of biodiversity in order to protect ecosystems while meeting the needs of the human population. Humans require properly functioning ecosystems to maintain our supply of natural resources, including food, medicines, and building materials.
Habitat Fragmentation02:31

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uncovering correlates of decline and critical refuges for a threatened terrestrial mammal.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same author

A Standardized Definition of Rapid Evidence Assessment for Environmental Applications.

Conservation letters·2026
Same author

How monitoring matters for nature conservation: 15 reasons framed in a theory of change.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Multiple-use spatial planning for sustainable development and conservation.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2025
Same author

Multi-Species Telemetry Quantifies Current and Future Efficacy of a Remote Marine Protected Area.

Global change biology·2025
Same author

The estimated cost of preventing extinction and progressing recovery for Australia's priority threatened species.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting.

Edward T Game1, Peter Kareiva, Hugh P Possingham

  • 1Conservation Science, The Nature Conservancy, 245 Riverside Drive, West End, QLD, 4101, Australia. egame@tnc.org

Conservation Biology : the Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|April 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Conservation prioritization schemes often contain errors. This study identifies six common mistakes in setting conservation priorities and offers guidance to improve resource allocation and decision-making for better conservation outcomes.

More Related Videos

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Conservation Science
  • Decision Science
  • Resource Allocation

Background:

  • Numerous prioritization schemes exist to guide conservation resource allocation.
  • Quantitative approaches in conservation prioritization are frequently misapplied, compromising rigor and scientific intent.
  • Errors in setting conservation priorities can undermine effective resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify common mistakes in conservation prioritization schemes.
  • To offer guidance for avoiding these mistakes in future conservation planning.
  • To improve the scientific rigor and effectiveness of conservation resource allocation.

Main Methods:

  • Drawing on established principles of decision science.
  • Identifying and explaining six common mistakes in conservation prioritization.
  • Providing a framework to help conservation planners avoid these errors.

Main Results:

  • Six common mistakes in conservation prioritization were identified: not recognizing plans as prioritizations, addressing ill-defined problems, failing to prioritize actions, introducing arbitrariness, incorporating hidden value judgments, and ignoring the risk of failure.
  • These mistakes can lead to suboptimal resource allocation and reduced conservation effectiveness.
  • A clear path is offered to help conservation planners avoid these pitfalls.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing these six common mistakes is crucial for robust conservation prioritization.
  • Applying decision science principles can enhance the scientific basis of conservation planning.
  • Avoiding these errors will lead to more effective and scientifically sound allocation of conservation resources.