Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Women's experiences in a community-based participatory research randomized controlled trial
Shawn M Kneipp1, Barbara J Lutz, Catherine Levonian
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. skneipp@email.unc.edu
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) integration in studies with disadvantaged women improved experiences. Key factors included tailored questionnaires, staff interactions, and understanding randomization, leading to transformative outcomes in the randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Community-Based Participatory Research
- Clinical Trial Design
Background:
- Disadvantaged populations often benefit from community-based participatory research (CBPR) integrated into traditional study designs.
- Limited understanding exists regarding participant experiences and the processes driving positive outcomes in such integrated studies.
- Simultaneous occurrence of undesirable effects alongside positive outcomes in these studies is not well-documented.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the experiences of disadvantaged women participating in a CBPR-driven randomized controlled trial (RCT).
- To understand participants' interpretations of study findings and the processes influencing their experiences.
- To identify factors contributing to transformative experiences within the RCT.
Main Methods:
- Focus group interviews were conducted with 31 disadvantaged women.
- Dimensional analysis was employed to analyze qualitative data from interviews.
- Participants shared their experiences within a CBPR-driven RCT.
Main Results:
- Tailored health questionnaires significantly impacted participants' experiences.
- Interactions with study staff were a crucial element in shaping participant perceptions.
- Participants' understanding of and responses to the randomization process were key to their transformative experiences.
- CBPR and non-CBPR elements influenced both process and endpoint outcomes.
Conclusions:
- CBPR integration can lead to transformative participant experiences in RCTs with disadvantaged groups.
- Specific study design elements (questionnaires, staff interaction, randomization understanding) are critical.
- Understanding participant experiences is vital for optimizing interventions and study designs in diverse populations.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
