Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
QRS morphology, left ventricular lead location, and clinical outcome in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization
Jagdesh Kandala1, Gaurav A Upadhyay, Robert K Altman
1Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital Heart Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Insights
Optimizing left ventricular lead electrical delay (LVLED) improves cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes in both left bundle branch block (LBBB) and non-LBBB patients. A longer LVLED is associated with reduced heart failure hospitalizations and improved survival.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) effectiveness varies, particularly in non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) patients.
- Left ventricular (LV) lead placement significantly influences CRT outcomes, yet its specific role in non-LBBB populations requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of both electrical and anatomical LV lead positioning on CRT outcomes.
- To analyze the relationship between baseline QRS morphology and LV lead characteristics in predicting CRT success.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 144 patients undergoing CRT were analyzed.
- Left ventricular lead electrical delay (LVLED) was measured intra-procedurally, corrected for QRS width.
- Outcomes assessed included time to first heart failure hospitalization (HFH) and a composite of mortality, HFH, LVAD implantation, and cardiac transplantation at 3 years.
Main Results:
- Patients with non-LBBB experienced higher HFH rates compared to LBBB patients (43.5% vs. 24%).
- In both LBBB and non-LBBB groups, a longer LVLED (≥50%) was associated with significantly lower HFH rates (17% vs. 53% in LBBB; 36% vs. 61% in non-LBBB).
- Adjusted analyses confirmed that a longer LVLED was independently associated with improved event-free survival for both HFH and the composite outcome in non-LBBB patients.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy delivered from LV pacing sites with a longer LVLED demonstrates favorable outcomes.
- Optimizing LV lead placement based on electrical delay is crucial for improving CRT efficacy in both LBBB and non-LBBB patient groups.
Aims:
Several studies have reported a poor outcome with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients. Although the left ventricular (LV) lead location is an important determinant of the clinical outcome, there is scant information regarding its role in non-LBBB patients. This study sought to examine the impact of electrical and anatomical location of the LV lead in relation to baseline QRS morphology on the CRT outcome.
Methods And Results:
A left ventricular lead electrical delay (LVLED) was measured intra-procedurally as an interval between QRS onset on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) to the peak of sensed electrogram on LV lead and corrected for QRS width. The impact of the LVLED on time to first heart failure hospitalization (HFH), and composite outcome of all-cause mortality, HFH, LVAD implantation, and cardiac transplantation at 3 years was assessed. Among 144 patients (age 67 ± 12 years, QRS duration 156 ± 28 ms, non-LBBB 43%), HFH was higher in non-LBBB compared with LBBB (43.5 vs. 24%, P = 0.015). Within LBBB, patients with the long LVLED (≥50%) had 17% HFH vs. 53% in the short LVLED (<50%), P = 0.002. Likewise in non-LBBB, patients with the long LVLED compared with the short LVLED had a lower HFH (36 vs. 61%, P = 0.026). In adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, the long LVLED in LBBB and non-LBBB was associated with an improved outcome. Specifically, in non-LBBB, LVLED ≥50% was associated with improved event-free survival with respect to time to first HFH (HR: 0.34; P = 0.011) and composite outcome (HR: 0.41; P = 0.019).
Conclusion:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy delivered from an LV pacing site characterized by the long LVLED was associated with the favourable outcome in LBBB and non-LBBB patients.
More Related Videos
10:17Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy