Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Patellar changes following knee joint endoprosthesis-plasty].

J Mach1, M Meikies

  • 1Klinik für Orthopädie, Bereiches Medizin, Wilhelm-Pieck-Universität Rostock.

Beitrage Zur Orthopadie Und Traumatologie
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

This study found no significant differences between Guepar, Tillmann, and GSB knee prostheses. Patellar dislocations were common, particularly in rheumatoid arthritis patients, but manageable with patellar modeling and muscle strengthening.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DFT study of water on graphene: Synergistic effect of multilayer p-doping.

The Journal of chemical physics·2023
Same author

Density functional study of gallium clusters on graphene: electronic doping and diffusion.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2020
Same author

Electronic transport properties of graphene doped by gallium.

Nanotechnology·2017
Same author

[Informed consent].

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2013
Same author

[Right to privacy].

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2013
Same author

[Lege artis].

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2013

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rheumatology

Context:

  • Analysis of 80 knee prostheses (Guepar, Tillmann, GSB) focusing on postoperative patellar positioning and degenerative changes.
  • Evaluation of patient outcomes, including patellar dislocations and functional knee status.

Purpose:

  • To compare the performance of different knee endoprostheses regarding patellar stability and degenerative joint disease.
  • To identify factors influencing complications and functional outcomes after knee replacement surgery.

Summary:

  • No significant differences were observed between Guepar, Tillmann, and GSB knee prostheses in terms of postoperative patellar position or degenerative changes.
  • Patellar dislocations were frequently observed, especially in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, though most patients experienced minimal issues with the operated knee.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Recommendations include patellar modeling and diligent muscle strength reconstruction to mitigate postoperative complications.

    • Impact:

    • Provides insights into the comparative efficacy of common knee prostheses.
    • Highlights the prevalence of patellar dislocations and suggests strategies for prevention and management.
    • Informs clinical practice regarding patient selection and surgical technique for knee replacement, particularly in patients with inflammatory conditions.