Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

08:21
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer)
Likun Zhang1, Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, Venkata Sreekanth Arikatla
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Surgical Endoscopy
|April 11, 2013
Summary
Virtual reality surgical training using the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST-PT) and Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) systems shows significant skill improvement. However, training on one system did not significantly transfer to the other, indicating system specificity.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Education
- Virtual Reality Simulation
- Medical Training Technologies
Background:
- Mastering laparoscopic surgical skills demands extensive practice and time.
- The Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST-PT) is a virtual reality simulation of the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) peg transfer task.
- Assessing the VBLaST-PT's learning curve and convergent validity against the FLS is crucial for its development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the learning curve for the VBLaST-PT virtual peg transfer task.
- To compare trainee performance on VBLaST-PT with the established FLS system.
- To establish convergent validity for the VBLaST-PT using cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis.
Main Methods:
- Eighteen medical students were randomly assigned to control, VBLaST-training, or FLS-training groups.
- Trainees completed 150 trials of the peg-transfer task over 3 weeks.
- Cumulative summation (CUSUM) scores were calculated based on junior, intermediate, and senior performance criteria.
Main Results:
- Both VBLaST-PT and FLS groups demonstrated significant skill improvement and retention over 150 trials.
- A higher proportion of FLS-trained students achieved higher performance criteria compared to VBLaST-trained students.
- Skill transfer was system-specific: VBLaST-trained subjects performed better on VBLaST-PT, and FLS-trained subjects performed better on FLS.
Conclusions:
- The VBLaST-PT system effectively characterizes learning curves for virtual laparoscopic skills using CUSUM analysis.
- Both virtual reality and traditional simulators facilitate significant skill acquisition in laparoscopic surgery.
- Training on either VBLaST-PT or FLS does not significantly transfer to the other system, suggesting distinct learning pathways.
