Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Modeling and analysis of forward and inverse kinematics for a flexible Stewart platform.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Barriers and facilitators to healthcare utilization amongst people living with sickle cell disease in the United States: A scoping review.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Enhancing data completeness in time series: Imputation strategies for missing data using significant periodically correlated components.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Key targets and mechanisms by which gut microbiota-derived metabolites regulate Alzheimer's disease through the immune - inflammatory pathway: Based on network pharmacology and molecular docking.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Grid-tied Transformer-less Boost Switched Capacitor Topology (TLBSCT) for PV applications.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

The load-velocity profiles and exercise-specific velocity zones for seven commonly used weightlifting exercises.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

qPCRTag Analysis - A High Throughput, Real Time PCR Assay for Sc2.0 Genotyping
07:00

qPCRTag Analysis - A High Throughput, Real Time PCR Assay for Sc2.0 Genotyping

Published on: May 25, 2015

Testing jumps via false discovery rate control.

Yu-Min Yen1

  • 1Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. YMYEN@econ.sinica.edu.tw

Plos One
|April 11, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method to control false discoveries in jump testing using the false discovery rate (FDR). This approach improves reliability, especially for rare jump events in financial data analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

qPCRTag Analysis - A High Throughput, Real Time PCR Assay for Sc2.0 Genotyping
07:00

qPCRTag Analysis - A High Throughput, Real Time PCR Assay for Sc2.0 Genotyping

Published on: May 25, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Econometrics
  • Statistical Inference
  • Financial Time Series Analysis

Background:

  • Nonparametric jump tests often involve multiple hypothesis testing.
  • Controlling Type I error in these tests can lead to many false rejections, particularly with rare jump occurrences.
  • Existing methods struggle with reliability when jump events are infrequent.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To enhance the reliability of nonparametric jump tests by controlling the false discovery rate (FDR).
  • To address the issue of excessive erroneous rejections in multiple hypothesis testing for jump detection.
  • To provide a robust statistical framework for analyzing high-frequency financial data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing the Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (BNS) test statistic for jump detection.
  • Implementing the Benjamini and Hochberg (BH) procedure to control the false discovery rate (FDR).
  • Developing and analyzing asymptotic results for FDR control in this context.

Main Results:

  • Asymptotic theory confirms the effectiveness of the proposed FDR control method.
  • Simulation studies demonstrate the advantages of controlling FDR over traditional Type I error control.
  • The hybrid approach shows practical utility in analyzing real-world financial data.

Conclusions:

  • Controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) offers a more reliable approach for nonparametric jump testing.
  • The combined BNS statistic and BH procedure provide a powerful tool for financial econometrics.
  • This method enhances the analysis of high-frequency trading data by reducing false positives.