Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are functional deficits in concussed individuals consistent with white matter structural alterations: combined FMRI & DTI study.

Experimental brain researchยท2010
Same author

Postprandial lipaemia, oxidative stress and endothelial function: a review.

International journal of clinical practiceยท2010
Same author

Stability of crystalline sodium penicillin G.

The Pharmaceutical journalยท2010
Same author

The problem of syphilis as seen by the Veterans Administration.

Journal of social hygieneยท2010
Same author

Bacitracin therapy; Local treatment of the first 100 cases of antibiotic surgical infections.

Medizinische Nachrichten aus den Vereinigten Staatenยท2010
Same author

Crystalline sodium penicillin G; some observations on its stability in solution and on related matters.

Quarterly journal of pharmacy and pharmacologyยท2010

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake
04:46

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake

Published on: September 18, 2018

Methodology for the evaluation of the Stephanie Alexander Kitchen Garden program.

L Gibbs1, P K Staiger, M Townsend

  • 1The McCaughey VicHealth Centre of Community Wellbeing, The University of Melbourne, Australia. lgibbs@unimelb.edu.au

Health Promotion Journal of Australia : Official Journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals
|April 12, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study developed an evaluation framework for the Stephanie Alexander Kitchen Garden (SAKG) program, a school-based cooking and gardening initiative. The mixed-methods approach provides a robust model for assessing such programs and informing future research.

More Related Videos

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions
07:03

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions

Published on: November 6, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake
04:46

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake

Published on: September 18, 2018

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions
07:03

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions

Published on: November 6, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Public health
  • Health promotion
  • Experiential learning

Background:

  • Growing international interest in community and school cooking and gardening programs.
  • Limited empirical evidence on the effectiveness of these programs.
  • Need for robust evaluation frameworks to assess program impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present the evaluation framework and methods for the Stephanie Alexander Kitchen Garden (SAKG) program.
  • To meet the information needs of all stakeholders involved in the SAKG program.
  • To address the lack of evidence on the effectiveness of school-based cooking and gardening programs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a public health ecological approach, health promotion principles, and experiential learning models.
  • Employed a non-randomized comparison design with six intervention and six comparison primary schools in Victoria, Australia.
  • Implemented a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative data collection at baseline and 1-year follow-up.

Main Results:

  • The evaluation design addressed limitations in existing studies of cooking or garden programs.
  • The multistrand, mixed-methods approach maintained methodological rigor and explored complex findings.
  • Identified limited sensitivity in some quantitative measures and potential bias in qualitative data coding.

Conclusions:

  • The SAKG evaluation methodology offers a suitable approach for school-based kitchen garden programs.
  • Demonstrates the feasibility of comprehensive evaluations for school-based initiatives.
  • Highlights the crucial role of qualitative methods within mixed-method evaluations for stakeholder engagement.