Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Law of Independent Assortment

Law of Independent Assortment

While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.

Law of Independent Assortment

Law of Independent Assortment

While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Decision reversals in sequential decision-making.

Communications psychology·2026

Same author

Reply to 'Boundary issues for multidimensional frameworks of representation'.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026

Same author

Distilling noise characteristics and prior expectations in multisensory causal inference.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same author

Field reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised among life-sentenced prisoners in Sweden: A follow-up study.

Law and human behavior·2026

Same author

Clarifying the conceptual dimensions of representation in neuroscience.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026

Same author

Stereo-encephalography-guided multi-lead deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory obsessive compulsive disorder - Study design and individualized surgical targeting approach.

Journal of affective disorders·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Independence is elusive: set size effects on encoding precision in visual search.

Helga Mazyar¹, Ronald van den Berg, Robert L Seilheimer

¹Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Journal of Vision

|April 12, 2013

Summary

Visual search difficulty increases with more items due to noise. This study shows that decreased precision with larger set sizes is common, even with predictable distractors, impacting visual attention.

More Related Videos

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)

Published on: September 7, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)

Published on: September 7, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Visual Perception
Neuroscience

Background:

Visual search performance degrades as the number of stimuli (set size) increases.
Signal detection theory explains this by cumulative distractor noise and potentially reduced precision per stimulus (divided attention).
Previous research suggested set size effects were solely due to distractor noise, especially with predictable stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how distractor statistics influence the relationship between set size and encoding precision in visual search.
To determine if decreased precision with increasing set size is a general phenomenon or specific to unpredictable distractors.
To bridge the gap between findings for predictable and unpredictable distractor conditions.

Main Methods:

Conducted experiments varying distractor heterogeneity and dissociating homogeneity from predictability.
Systematically manipulated the statistical properties of distractors in visual search tasks.
Analyzed the impact of set size on encoding precision across different distractor conditions.

Main Results:

A significant decrease in encoding precision was observed as set size increased across all experimental conditions.
This decrease in precision was evident regardless of distractor predictability or homogeneity.
The findings challenge the notion that encoding precision is independent of set size in visual search.

Conclusions:

Reduced encoding precision with increasing set size is a general finding in visual search, not limited to unpredictable distractors.
The independence of precision from set size appears to be an exceptional case.
These results have implications for understanding visual attention and information processing limitations.