How MRI compatible is "MRI compatible"? A systematic comparison of artifacts caused by biopsy needles at 3.0 and 1.5

Tobias Penzkofer1,2, Nilufar Peykan3, Katja Schmidt4

  • 1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, Aachen, 52074, Germany. tpenzkofer@ukaachen.de.

Abstract

Insights

MRI-compatible needles create varying artifacts, significantly influenced by needle/mandrin type and orientation, not just field strength or sequence. Careful selection based on procedure is crucial for minimizing imaging interference.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) guided interventions require specialized tools.
  • Understanding imaging artifacts from interventional needles is critical for diagnostic accuracy and patient safety.
  • Existing
  • Purpose_of_the_Study: [
  • To systematically evaluate imaging artifacts generated by various MRI-compatible interventional needles.
  • To investigate the impact of magnetic field strength, needle/mandrin composition, orientation, and pulse sequence on artifact size.
  • To provide data for informed needle selection in MRI-guided procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate imaging artifacts generated by various MRI-compatible interventional needles.
  • To investigate the impact of magnetic field strength, needle/mandrin composition, orientation, and pulse sequence on artifact size.
  • To provide data for informed needle selection in MRI-guided procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Eight MRI-compatible needles were tested in porcine tissue.
  • Examinations were conducted at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using balanced-steady-state-free-precession (B-SSFP) and T1-weighted-spoiled-gradient-echo (T1-SPGR) sequences.
  • Needle orientation relative to the B0 field was varied, and artifact diameters (inner and outer) were measured and analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Significant variations in artifact size were observed, primarily driven by needle and mandrin type, and needle orientation.
  • Artifact dimensions ranged from 0.7 mm to 71.4 mm.
  • Pulse sequence and field strength had a lesser impact; inner artifact sizes were comparable across field strengths and slightly larger in B-SSFP compared to T1-SPGR sequences.

Conclusions:

  • Despite being labeled
  • MR compatible,
  • interventional needles exhibit substantial differences in artifact generation.
  • Mandrin type and needle orientation are key factors influencing artifact size.
  • An empirical approach to needle selection, considering lesion characteristics and trajectory, is recommended.

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:24

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI01:21

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, or CMRI, is a non-invasive diagnostic test that employs a magnetic field and radiofrequency waves to create precise images of the heart and arteries. It provides comprehensive information about cardiac anatomy, function, perfusion, and tissue characterization without ionizing radiation.IndicationsCMRI diagnoses various heart conditions, including tissue damage from heart attacks, ischemic heart disease, myocarditis, aortic issues (tears, aneurysms,...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI01:14

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

Introduction: MRI and CT scans are crucial advancements in medical imaging techniques, playing a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Each scan serves distinct purposes, targets specific areas, and requires unique nursing duties.
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:27

Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Introduction:Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or MRI, can include a specialized imaging technique of the urinary system known as Magnetic Resonance Urography (MRU). This radiation-free technique uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves to produce detailed images with the help of a computer. MRU is particularly effective for visualizing fluid-filled structures like the kidneys, ureters, and bladder.Applications of MRI in the Genitourinary SystemKidneys and Ureters: MRI detects tumors, cysts,...