Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Mouse Models of Cancer Study02:43

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethics and Controversies in Animal Subjects Research and Impact on Clinical Decision-Making.

Anesthesiology clinics·2024
Same author

60 Years of the 3Rs symposium: Lessons learned and the road ahead.

ALTEX·2024
Same author

<i>Alternatives to Laboratory Animals</i>: Trends in <i>Replacement</i> and the Three Rs.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2022
Same author

Clinical impact of high-profile animal-based research reported in the UK national press.

BMJ open science·2022
Same author

It's Time to Include Harm to Humans in Harm-Benefit Analysis - But How to Do It, That is the Question.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2021
Same author

It's Time to Reconsider <i>The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique</i>.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2020
Same journal

Conference Diary.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Spotlight on Three Rs Progress.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Resources Round-up.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Editorial.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

<i>Galleria mellonella</i> as an invertebrate screening model for biocompatibility and <i>in vivo</i> functionality testing of imaging contrast agents.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Data-driven science, ethics and risk: Building knowledge of key ethics-risk intersections relevant to public sector decision-making.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Assessing Burrowing, Nest Construction, and Hoarding in Mice
08:23

Assessing Burrowing, Nest Construction, and Hoarding in Mice

Published on: January 5, 2012

Are animal tests inherently valid?

Michael Balls1

  • 1FRAME, Russell & Burch House, 96-98 North Sherwood Street, Nottingham NG1 4EE, UK. michael.balls@frame.org.uk

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals : ATLA
|April 16, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Animal testing validity is questioned, rejecting the idea that it is inherently reliable. New animal test validation should meet the same rigorous standards as non-animal alternatives.

More Related Videos

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative
07:59

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative

Published on: August 21, 2021

Noninvasive, In-pen Approach Test for Laboratory-housed Pigs
06:30

Noninvasive, In-pen Approach Test for Laboratory-housed Pigs

Published on: June 5, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Assessing Burrowing, Nest Construction, and Hoarding in Mice
08:23

Assessing Burrowing, Nest Construction, and Hoarding in Mice

Published on: January 5, 2012

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative
07:59

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative

Published on: August 21, 2021

Noninvasive, In-pen Approach Test for Laboratory-housed Pigs
06:30

Noninvasive, In-pen Approach Test for Laboratory-housed Pigs

Published on: June 5, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Regulatory Science
  • Animal Welfare

Background:

  • The scientific community widely accepts animal testing for regulatory purposes.
  • Concerns exist regarding the inherent validity and ethical implications of animal testing.
  • The validation process for new testing methods is crucial for ensuring reliable scientific outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the assumption that animal tests are inherently valid.
  • To determine if animal test validation processes should differ from those for non-animal tests.
  • To advocate for consistent validation standards across all testing methodologies.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion and critical analysis of the proposition of inherent animal test validity.
  • Comparative review of validation processes for animal and non-animal testing strategies.
  • Examination of scientific and ethical justifications for testing method validation.

Main Results:

  • The proposition that animal tests are inherently valid solely due to being animal tests is rejected.
  • No justifiable reason exists to apply less stringent validation to animal tests compared to non-animal tests.
  • Current validation practices may not consistently uphold scientific rigor for all animal testing procedures.

Conclusions:

  • The inherent validity of animal tests is not scientifically supported.
  • Validation processes for all new or modified testing strategies, whether animal or non-animal, must be equally stringent.
  • Ensuring equivalent validation rigor promotes more reliable and ethical scientific assessments.