Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Environmental shedding of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile by asymptomatic carriers: A prospective observational study.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2020

Same author

Universal screening for Clostridioides difficile in a tertiary hospital: risk factors for carriage and clinical disease.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2019

Same author

On the Presence of Sugar in Healthy Blood.

Edinburgh medical journal·2018

Same author

Imaging the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Cognitive Processes at High Temporal Resolution.

Neural computation·2018

Same author

Revealing instances of coordination among multiple cortical areas.

Biological cybernetics·2013

Same author

Extracting cortical current dipoles from MEG recordings.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2013

Same journal

Detection of cochlear microphonic for differential diagnosis between auditory neuropathy mice and noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss mice.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026

Same journal

Assessment metrics for pain control in rats: A methodological commentary.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026

Same journal

Infant EEG preprocessing pipelines: A capability framework and current gaps in practice.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026

Same journal

Methods for measuring neural activity during voluntary wheel running.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026

Same journal

Serotype-dependent differences in AAV cellular transduction rates in the hypothalamus of Arctic ground squirrels.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026

Same journal

Rapid generation of human sensory neurons from iPSC for modeling of peripheral neuropathies.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Microbiota of Attine Ants' Gardens: Visualizing a Microbial Landscape by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Microbiota of Attine Ants' Gardens: Visualizing a Microbial Landscape by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Published on: October 4, 2024

Cleaning MEG artifacts using external cues.

I Tal¹, M Abeles

¹Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Israel.

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

|April 16, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a method to remove artifacts from Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings using external cues. This technique effectively cleans brain activity data without compromising signal quality.

More Related Videos

How to Detect Amygdala Activity with Magnetoencephalography using Source Imaging

How to Detect Amygdala Activity with Magnetoencephalography using Source Imaging

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Microbiota of Attine Ants' Gardens: Visualizing a Microbial Landscape by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Microbiota of Attine Ants' Gardens: Visualizing a Microbial Landscape by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Published on: October 4, 2024

How to Detect Amygdala Activity with Magnetoencephalography using Source Imaging

How to Detect Amygdala Activity with Magnetoencephalography using Source Imaging

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Biomedical Engineering
Signal Processing

Background:

Brain activity recordings like EEG, ECoG, MEG, and microelectrodes are susceptible to artifacts.
Common artifact sources include power lines, video equipment, vibrations, and external activities.
Low amplitudes in MEG recordings make them particularly vulnerable to distortions from even minor artifacts.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop an efficient method for removing artifacts from MEG recordings.
To preserve the integrity of neuromagnetic signals during artifact removal.
To reduce artifact contribution without affecting data dimensionality.

Main Methods:

Recording external cues simultaneously with MEG data acquisition.
Utilizing external cues to identify precise artifact timing and spectral characteristics.
Applying artifact removal procedures based on registered cue information.

Main Results:

External cues effectively registered artifact occurrences and spectral properties.
The proposed method successfully reduced artifact contributions in MEG signals.
Preservation of both spectral content and time-domain wave-shapes of the neuromagnetic signal was achieved.
The rank of the data was not reduced by the artifact removal process.

Conclusions:

Recording external cues is an efficient strategy for artifact removal in MEG.
This method enhances the quality of neuromagnetic recordings by minimizing artifact interference.
The technique ensures the fidelity of the underlying neural signals for further analysis.