Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Synthesis and Characterization of an Aspirin-fumarate Prodrug that Inhibits NFκB Activity and Breast Cancer Stem Cells
Published on: January 18, 2017
Dimethylfumarate: potency prediction and clinical experience
David A Basketter1, Ian R White, Florence G Burleson
1DABMEB Consultancy Ltd, Sharnbrook MK44 1PR, UK. dabmebconsultancyltd@me.com
Background:
Dimethylfumarate (DMF) was the cause of a major outbreak of allergic contact dermatitis as a consequence of its use as an antifungal agent in leather products, particularly in furniture, with what became known as 'toxic sofa dermatitis'.
Objectives:
To determine whether the frequency and severity of reactions to DMF arose as a function of its intrinsic potency and/or the nature and extent of exposure.
Methods:
The intrinsic potency of DMF was measured with the standard local lymph node assay (LLNA), with determination of an EC3 value, which is the threshold in the LLNA and serves as an indicator of relative skin-sensitizing potency in humans.
Results:
The EC3 value for DMF was 0.35% when tested in dimethylformamide as a vehicle, indicating that DMF is a strong, but not an extreme, skin sensitizer in this mouse model.
Conclusions:
DMF appears to have a sensitizing potency in the mouse that is very similar to that of formaldehyde, which is also a strong human skin sensitizer. However, the frequency and intensity of allergic contact dermatitis reactions to DMF suggest that it was the prolonged, repeated and occlusive exposure to this chemical over large skin areas, combined with the strong sensitizing potency, that generated the 'perfect storm' conditions that caused the DMF epidemic.
Insights
Dimethylfumarate (DMF) is a strong skin sensitizer. The widespread allergic contact dermatitis outbreak was caused by prolonged exposure to DMF in leather products, not just its intrinsic potency.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Toxicology
- Immunology
Background:
- Dimethylfumarate (DMF) caused a widespread allergic contact dermatitis outbreak, termed 'toxic sofa dermatitis', due to its use as an antifungal in leather goods.
- The outbreak highlighted the need to understand factors contributing to DMF-induced skin reactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if the frequency and severity of allergic contact dermatitis from DMF were related to its inherent potency or the extent of exposure.
- To quantify the skin-sensitizing potential of DMF.
Main Methods:
- The intrinsic skin-sensitizing potency of Dimethylfumarate (DMF) was assessed using the standard local lymph node assay (LLNA).
- An EC3 value, indicating the concentration required for a 3-fold increase in lymphocyte proliferation, was determined as a measure of relative skin-sensitizing potency.
Main Results:
- The EC3 value for DMF was determined to be 0.35% in dimethylformamide, classifying it as a strong, but not extreme, skin sensitizer in the mouse model.
- This potency is comparable to that of formaldehyde, another known strong human skin sensitizer.
Conclusions:
- The high incidence and severity of allergic contact dermatitis linked to DMF suggest that prolonged, repeated, and occlusive exposure over large skin areas, combined with its strong sensitizing ability, created conditions for an epidemic.
- The findings underscore the critical role of exposure patterns in the development of chemical-induced allergic contact dermatitis.
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy