Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...

Review and Preview

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

Proofreading

Proofreading

Proofreading

Proofreading

Proofreading

Proofreading

Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore, it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase Enzyme

Feedback Inhibition

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Machine learning dislocation density correlations and solute effects in Mg-based alloys.

Scientific reports·2023

Same author

Janićević et al. Reply.

Physical review letters·2017

Same author

Path (un)predictability of two interacting cracks in polycarbonate sheets using Digital Image Correlation.

Scientific reports·2016

Same author

Boundary lubrication with a liquid crystal monolayer.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2014

Same author

Evolution of grain contacts in a granular sample under creep and stress relaxation.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2013

Same author

Modeling the viscosity and aggregation of suspensions of highly anisotropic nanoparticles.

The European physical journal. E, Soft matter·2012

Same journal

MT-MRI for detection of renal interstitial fibrosis in renovascular disease.

Scientific reports·2026

Same journal

Detection of underground objects from GPR data using a lightweight YOLO-based approach.

Scientific reports·2026

Same journal

Early systemic inflammatory-metabolic trajectory phenotypes are associated with survival outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab.

Scientific reports·2026

Same journal

Water balance components in a dry-seeded rice-wheat system: Untangling the effects of tillage and mulching practices.

Scientific reports·2026

Same journal

Topological approaches to quantum tensor train compression via ZX-calculus and SVD.

Scientific reports·2026

Same journal

determinants of flood impacts and adaptive capacity among market vendors in Walukuba-Masese, Jinja city, Uganda.

Scientific reports·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

How important tasks are performed: peer review.

T Hartonen¹, M J Alava

¹Aalto University, School of Science, Department of Applied Physics, PO Box 14100, 00076 Aalto, Finland.

Scientific Reports

|April 18, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Scientists

More Related Videos

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform

Published on: April 12, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform

Published on: April 12, 2021

Area of Science:

Scientific publishing and peer review processes.
Behavioral science and decision-making models.

Background:

The peer review process is crucial for scientific advancement, relying on individual scientists' efforts.
Understanding referee behavior, including decision-making patterns, is key to optimizing scientific publishing.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the relationship between the time taken by referees to complete manuscript reviews and their final verdict.
To model referee decision-making as a task completion process influenced by deadlines and external factors.

Main Methods:

Analysis of data on referee report completion times.
Comparison of empirical data with a computational model simulating task completion under deadline pressure.

Main Results:

Referee report duration is significantly influenced by the eventual decision (accept/reject).
A deadline-effect model, incorporating task competition and external "friction," accurately reflects observed review times.

Conclusions:

Referee behavior in the peer review process exhibits both predictable patterns and stochastic variations.
The findings offer insights into the human factors affecting scientific publishing and the efficiency of peer review.