Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

05:30
Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
Potential smear layer interference with bonding of self-etching adhesives to dentin
Yuji Suyama1, Anne-Katrin Lührs, Jan De Munck
1Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
|April 18, 2013
Summary
Smear debris significantly reduces the bond strength of mild and ultra-mild self-etching adhesives to dentin. Stronger self-etching adhesives and etch-and-rinse adhesives show less interference from smear debris.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Adhesive Dentistry
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Self-etching adhesives simplify dental procedures by combining etching and priming.
- The smear layer, a byproduct of cavity preparation, can affect adhesive-dentin interaction.
- Understanding the influence of the smear layer on different self-etching adhesive types is crucial for predictable clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how the smear layer impacts the bonding effectiveness of self-etching dental adhesives.
- To compare the performance of self-etching adhesives with varying etching potentials when applied to smear-layered versus smear-free dentin.
Main Methods:
- Human molars were prepared to create both bur-cut (smear-layered) and smear-free dentin surfaces.
- Five adhesive systems were tested: a strong one-step, two ultra-mild one-step, a mild two-step self-etching adhesive, and a three-step etch-and-rinse control.
- Microtensile bond strength (µTBS) was measured after 24-hour water storage, and failure modes were analyzed using stereomicroscopy and SEM.
Main Results:
- Mild and ultra-mild self-etching adhesives exhibited significantly lower bond strength on smear-layered dentin compared to smear-free dentin.
- A strong one-step self-etching adhesive showed less sensitivity to the smear layer.
- The etch-and-rinse control adhesive demonstrated the highest bond strength, unaffected by the smear layer.
- SEM analysis confirmed smear debris incorporation into the adhesive layer with ultra-mild adhesives on bur-cut dentin.
Conclusions:
- Smear debris negatively interferes with the bonding efficacy of mild and ultra-mild self-etching adhesives.
- The etching potential of self-etching adhesives influences their susceptibility to smear layer contamination.
- Etch-and-rinse adhesives may offer more reliable bonding in the presence of a smear layer.
Related Concept Videos
Masking and Demasking Agents
EDTA titrations may necessitate masking and demasking agents to temporarily protect a particular metal ion in a mixture from the EDTA reaction. These agents facilitate the sequential analysis of the metal ions by forming stable complexes with some—but not all—metal ions during certain steps.
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on the metal...
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on the metal...
Preparation of Samples for Electron Microscopy
To be visualized by an electron microscope, either transmission or scanning, biological samples need to be fixed (stabilized) so the electron beam does not destroy them and dried thoroughly (desiccated/dehydrated) so the vacuum does not affect them. Fixation needs to be done as quickly as possible because the sample properties will start changing as soon as it is removed from its natural environment. For example, in a tissue sample, the oxygen levels begin decreasing, causing an altered...
