Technical devices in children with motor disabilities: a review

S M Montero1, A Gómez-Conesa

  • 1Research Group in Physiotherapy and Health Promotion, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Murcia University , Espinardo-Murcia, Murcia , Spain.

Insights

This review assessed technical devices for children with motor disabilities, finding ankle and foot orthoses most common for cerebral palsy. More rigorous research is needed to confirm device effectiveness and patient satisfaction.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Assistive Technology

Background:

  • Motor disabilities significantly impact children's development and quality of life.
  • Technical devices offer potential solutions for enhancing mobility and function in pediatric populations.
  • Evidence-based practice requires a thorough understanding of the effectiveness of these interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of technical devices used in children aged 0-18 years with motor disabilities.
  • To identify the most commonly studied devices and pediatric conditions in the existing literature.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases (CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, PEDro, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Knowledge, SciFinder Web) from January 2000 to January 2012.
  • Inclusion criteria focused on studies with at least five children, encompassing randomized clinical trials, clinical trials, and prospective cohort studies.
  • Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale.

Main Results:

  • Out of 59 identified articles, 27 met the eligibility criteria for the review.
  • Ankle and foot orthoses were the most frequently evaluated technical devices.
  • Cerebral palsy was the most commonly studied pediatric condition among the included studies.

Conclusions:

  • The methodological quality of research on technical devices for children with motor disabilities requires improvement.
  • Future studies should employ more rigorous research designs to accurately assess the effectiveness and impact on movement quality.
  • Incorporating patient and family satisfaction into future research is crucial for a holistic evaluation of assistive technologies.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos