Effect of systematic dental shape modification in bitemarks

Studies on human cadaver models have reported significant levels of distortion of bitemarks in skin, indicating that tooth characteristics are not reliably transferred and recorded in the bitten subject. Moreover, matches among the anterior biting dentition in open population studies have been found. This prompts the question as to what degree of difference in shape will distinguish one dentition from another as reflected in a bitemark. In order to understand how these variables appear on skin, 10 dental casts with systematic variations in tooth positions were produced. The height of the lateral incisors was systematically altered in 1mm increments up to 3mm and lateral incisor/canines were altered in facial/lingual displacement in 1mm increments up to 5mm. Each of the models was used to produce a series of 10 repeated bites, distributed over arms and legs of un-embalmed cadavers. Landmark-based geometric morphometrics were used for analysis of digital images of the bitemarks. Results indicate that alterations of height and displacement of particular teeth affected the position of impressions created by the adjacent teeth. Displacement of one lateral incisor/canine led to a relative shift in impressions of the central incisors and unaltered canines, while height alteration of the lateral incisors led to a shift in relative position of central incisors as recorded in the bitemark. The prominence of displacements was more pronounced in the bitemarks than in images of the dentition used to make the bites, thus the bitemarks tended to exaggerate the differences. It was found that a displacement of 5mm between teeth allowed for reliable distinction between bitemarks. No such threshold of distinction could be established for differences in height of teeth under these experimental conditions. The effect of distortion was more significant in the mandibular than maxillary arch, suggesting that the mandible exhibits higher variation than the maxilla, as impressed in skin. Numerous bitemarks also exhibited arch flattening, consistent with recent studies showing arch width as the principal variable in a bitemark.