Related Experiment Videos
Local-level governance of risk and resilience in Nepal
Samantha Jones1, Komal Aryal, Andrew Collins
1Department of Geography, Northumbria University, United Kingdom. samantha.jones@northumbria.ac.uk
Abstract:
This paper explores the circumstances in which communities may effectively reduce risks. It draws on the example of two 'Risk and Resilience Committees' (RRCs) that were established in Nepal as part of an action research project: one in Panchkhal in the central region, operating as a community-based organisation (CBO); and the other in Dhankuta in the eastern region, embedded in municipal government. In-depth interviews were conducted with RRC members. Wider community preferences for risk reduction were examined through a questionnaire survey. In Dhankuta, the RRC obtained further funding, developed strong upward and downward institutional links, and applied a 'disaster risk reduction lens' to existing local government responsibilities. In Panchkhal, RRC activities have been limited by funding and have focused on the strengthening of livelihoods. It may be concluded tentatively that community-based disaster risk reduction activities are more successful when they are institutionally embedded in local government structures.
Related Concept Videos
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Global Regulatory Systems