Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Creating Dynamic Images of Short-lived Dopamine Fluctuations with lp-ntPET: Dopamine Movies of Cigarette Smoking
Published on: August 6, 2013
Automatic approach bias towards smoking cues is present in smokers but not in ex-smokers
Corinde E Wiers1, Simone Kühn, Amir Homayoun Javadi
1Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. corinde.wiers@gmail.com
Rationale:
Drug-addicted individuals show automatic approach tendencies towards drug-related cues, i.e., an approach bias (ApB). Nevertheless, little is known about ApB in tobacco smokers and about the presence of ApB after smoking abstinence.
Objectives:
We investigated ApB to smoking cues in heavy tobacco smokers versus never-smokers and studied its relation to smoking characteristics and craving. Second, we compared ApBs of heavy smokers with biases of abstinent heavy smokers.
Method:
A group of current heavy smokers (n = 24), ex-smokers who were abstinent for at least 5 years (n = 20), and never-smokers (n = 20) took part in the experiment. An indirect smoking approach avoidance task was performed, in which participants were required to respond to pictures of smoking and neutral cues by pulling (approach) or pushing (avoid) on a joystick, according to the content-irrelevant format of the picture (landscape or portrait). Craving scores were examined using the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges.
Results:
Heavy smokers showed an ApB for smoking cues compared to ex-smokers and never-smokers, which correlated positively to craving scores. There were no group differences in ApB scores for ex-smokers and never-smokers.
Conclusion:
These results suggest that ApBs for smoking cues are present in heavy smokers and decrease after long-term successful smoking cessation.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Motivational Bias
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Confirmation Biases
