Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: predictive power of models improves when combined together.

Journal of biomechanics·2014

Same author

Pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilisation of the lumbar spine: in vitro cadaver investigation and a finite element study.

Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering·2014

Same author

Application of an asymmetric finite element model of the C2-T1 cervical spine for evaluating the role of soft tissues in stability.

Medical engineering & physics·2014

Same author

Effect of the Coonrad elbow prosthesis on stresses in the humerus.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013

Same author

Effects of injury on the spinal motion segment mechanics in the axial compression mode.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013

Same author

A novel approach to the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniations: indications of simple discectomy and posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization based on carragee classification.

Advances in orthopedics·2013

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilization systems.

D U Erbulut¹, I Zafarparandeh, A F Ozer

¹Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Koc University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey ; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colleges of Engineering, Koc University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey.

Advances in Orthopedics

|April 23, 2013

Summary

Dynamic stabilization systems offer an alternative to rigid spinal fusion, potentially reducing adjacent segment degeneration and the need for revision surgeries. These systems aim to maintain spinal stability while preserving motion.

More Related Videos

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability

Published on: September 18, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability

Published on: September 18, 2020

Area of Science:

Orthopedic Surgery
Biomedical Engineering
Spinal Biomechanics

Background:

Rigid spinal instrumentation is the gold standard for fusion and stabilization in treating spinal disorders.
Current rigid fixation methods provide immediate stability but can lead to adjacent segment degeneration and hypermobility.
Adjacent segment degeneration is a common complication necessitating further surgical intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

To describe the biomechanical aspects of dynamic stabilization systems.
To present dynamic stabilization as an alternative to spinal fusion for specific patient populations.
To address the limitations of rigid fixation, particularly adjacent segment degeneration.

Main Methods:

Review of biomechanical principles underlying dynamic stabilization.
Comparison of dynamic stabilization systems with traditional rigid fixation.
Analysis of literature on fusion-associated phenomena and dynamic system outcomes.

Main Results:

Dynamic stabilization systems are designed to preserve segmental stability and motion.
These systems aim to mitigate or eliminate degenerative effects on adjacent spinal segments.
Potential to reduce the incidence of revision surgeries associated with adjacent segment degeneration.

Conclusions:

Dynamic stabilization systems represent a promising alternative to rigid fusion for select spinal conditions.
Understanding the biomechanics is crucial for optimizing dynamic stabilization strategies.
Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the long-term benefits and patient selection criteria.