Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
Published on: November 15, 2013
In praise of a model but not its conclusions: commentary on Cooper, Catmur, and Heyes (2012)
Bennett I Bertenthal1, Matthias Scheutz
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. bbertent@indiana.edu
Abstract:
Cooper et al. (this issue) develop an interactive activation model of spatial and imitative compatibilities that simulates the key results from Catmur and Heyes (2011) and thus conclude that both compatibilities are mediated by the same processes since their single model can predict all the results. Although the model is impressive, the conclusions are premature because they are based on an incomplete review of the relevant literature and because the model includes some questionable assumptions. Moreover, a competing model (Scheutz & Bertenthal, 2012) is introduced that suggests the two compatibilities are not mediated by the same processes. We propose that more research is necessary before concluding that spatial and imitative compatibilities are mediated by the same processes.
Related Concept Videos
Molecular Models
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with one...
Induced-fit Model
Enzymes exhibit substrate specificity, meaning that they can only bind to certain substrates. This is mainly determined by the shape and chemical characteristics of...
