Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Transformation of Organic Household Leftovers into a Peat Substitute
Published on: July 9, 2019
As(V) retention on soils and forest by-products and other waste materials
Natalia Seco-Reigosa1, Alipio Bermúdez-Couso, Beatriz Garrido-Rodríguez
1Departamento de Edafoloxía e Química Agrícola, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Escola Politécnica Superior, Campus univ. s/n, 27002, Lugo, Spain.
Abstract:
As(V) retention capacity is determined by means of adsorption/desorption trials performed for coarse and fine ground mussel shell, forest and vineyard soils with or without fine shell, pine wood ash, oak wood ash, pine sawdust and slate-processing fines. Pine ash shows the highest arsenic retention potential (with >97 % adsorption and ≤1 % desorption), followed by shell-amended forest soil (adsorption between 96 and 92 %), by un-amended forest soil (adsorption between 98 and 86 %) and by the amended vineyard soil (adsorption between 92 and 75 %). Sawdust is the material with the lowest arsenic retention capacity in most cases, with un-amended vineyard soil also showing poor results. In the case of oak ash, As(V) percentage adsorption becomes higher with increasing added arsenic concentrations, while this increase in added arsenic causes lower percentage adsorption in the case of slate fines. Regarding adsorption ability, As(V) adsorption data were fitted to Freundlich and Langmuir models, showing good fitting, with pine ash and shell-amended forest soil having the highest K F values. In view of that, mussel shell amendment would be useful to increase arsenic retention on forest and vineyard soils, while pine ash could be used to retain arsenic even from wastewaters.
Related Concept Videos
Bioremediation
The Carbon Cycle
The Soil Ecosystem
Biodeterioration
Bioplastics
What are Biogeochemical Cycles?

