Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026
09:51
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Revision surgery is overestimated in hip replacement
J C Keurentjes1, M Fiocco, B W Schreurs
1Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Albinusdreef 2, PO Box 9600, Postzone J-11-S, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Bone & Joint Research
|April 24, 2013
Summary
The Kaplan-Meier estimator overestimates revision surgery probability when patients die from other causes. Competing risk analysis provides a more accurate assessment for hip revision surgery outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery outcomes research
- Biostatistics and survival analysis
Background:
- The Kaplan-Meier estimator is standard for calculating revision surgery probability in orthopedics.
- However, it may introduce bias in the presence of competing risks, such as unrelated mortality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the bias of the Kaplan-Meier estimator in a competing risk setting for hip revision surgery.
- To compare Kaplan-Meier with competing risk models for accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Described Kaplan-Meier and competing risk models.
- Analyzed data from a 25-year hip revision surgery cohort (62 acetabular revisions).
- Assessed outcomes including revision surgery, unrelated death, and no loss to follow-up.
Main Results:
- Kaplan-Meier overestimated revision probability by 3% (5 yrs) to 60% (25 yrs).
- Bias increased proportionally with the cumulative incidence of competing events (unrelated death).
Conclusions:
- Ignoring competing risks significantly biases revision surgery probability estimates.
- Competing risk analysis is crucial for accurate orthopedic outcome assessment.
- A flowchart is proposed to guide statistical analysis selection.
