Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A threefold approach to boost photo-harvesting efficiency in covalent organic frameworks <i>via</i> strategic N-centre regulation.

Materials horizons·2026
Same author

Advanced functional porous materials for photocatalytic H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> production.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

Hierarchically Porous Multivariate COF Aerogel With Enhanced Diffusibility and Tailored Functionality for Highly Efficient Bromine Sequestration.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026
Same author

Covalently grafted MOP-on-MOF hybrid ionic-porous composite for efficient adsorption and catalysis.

Chemical science·2025
Same author

Forecasting Malaria in Indian States: A Time Series Approach with R Shiny Integration.

Malaria journal·2025
Same author

Bromine sequestration by advanced functional porous materials.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Bayesian average error-based approach to sample size calculations for hypothesis testing.

Eric M Reyes1, Sujit K Ghosh

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN, USA. reyesem@rose-hulman.edu

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|April 25, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new Bayesian framework for hypothesis testing and sample size determination, addressing limitations of classical methods. It optimizes error rates for more reliable medical study designs.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Classical statistical methods for sample size calculations have practical limitations.
  • Hypothesis testing relies on prespecified type I and type II error rates.
  • Existing methods may not adequately address real-world complexities in study design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel framework for hypothesis testing and sample size determination.
  • To utilize Bayesian average errors for optimizing statistical decision-making.
  • To enhance the reliability of sample size calculations in medical studies.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a framework using Bayesian average errors for hypothesis testing.
  • Defined a cutoff for rejecting the null hypothesis based on a test statistic.
  • Selected the cutoff to minimize a weighted sum of Bayesian average errors.
  • Determined sample size to bound the total error of the hypothesis test.

Main Results:

  • The proposed Bayesian framework offers an alternative to classical statistical approaches.
  • Methodology allows for minimizing a weighted sum of Bayesian average errors.
  • Sample size is determined by bounding the total error for hypothesis testing.
  • The framework was applied to common medical study designs.

Conclusions:

  • The Bayesian average error framework provides a flexible approach to hypothesis testing and sample size determination.
  • This methodology addresses practical limitations of traditional statistical methods.
  • The approach is applicable to various medical study designs, potentially improving efficiency and accuracy.