Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data
Mathew P White1, Ian Alcock, Benedict W Wheeler
1European Centre for Environment & Human Health, University of Exeter, Truro, United Kingdom. mathew.white@exeter.ac.uk
Abstract:
Urbanization is a potential threat to mental health and well-being. Cross-sectional evidence suggests that living closer to urban green spaces, such as parks, is associated with lower mental distress. However, earlier research was unable to control for time-invariant heterogeneity (e.g., personality) and focused on indicators of poor psychological health. The current research advances the field by using panel data from over 10,000 individuals to explore the relation between urban green space and well-being (indexed by ratings of life satisfaction) and between urban green space and mental distress (indexed by General Health Questionnaire scores) for the same people over time. Controlling for individual and regional covariates, we found that, on average, individuals have both lower mental distress and higher well-being when living in urban areas with more green space. Although effects at the individual level were small, the potential cumulative benefit at the community level highlights the importance of policies to protect and promote urban green spaces for well-being.
Related Concept Videos
Scatter Plot
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Econometric Views (EViews)
Cross-Sectional Research
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Gene-Environment Interactions