Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Epistasis Analysis01:09

Epistasis Analysis

Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets01:29

Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets

Advances in genomics have profoundly influenced drug discovery by increasing both the speed and accuracy of pharmaceutical development. Pharmacogenomics, which examines how genetic variation influences drug response, facilitates the identification of novel therapeutic targets and enables patient stratification for personalized treatment. These strategies contribute to improved drug efficacy, minimized adverse effects, and more efficient clinical trial design.Mapping genetic differences...
Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Applications of transcranial focused ultrasound for primary brain tumors.

Neuro-oncology advances·2026
Same author

ERO1a fosters glioblastoma aggressiveness and metabolic flexibility by regulating mitochondria-associated membrane dynamics.

Nature cell biology·2026
Same author

High-depth whole genome sequencing of premalignant breast lesions reveals rearrangement hotspots and personalized management opportunities.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Fast and accurate resolution of ecDNA sequence using Cycle-Extractor.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A recipe for chaos: Extrachromosomal DNA and the hallmarks of cancer.

Cell·2026
Same author

Accurate prediction of ecDNA in interphase cancer cells using deep neural networks.

Communications biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

When is hub gene selection better than standard meta-analysis?

Peter Langfelder1, Paul S Mischel, Steve Horvath

  • 1Department of Human Genetics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Plos One
|April 25, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Identifying biologically meaningful gene lists is more effective using intramodular hub genes from consensus networks than meta-analysis p-values. However, meta-analysis shows comparable or better validation success in genomic data analysis.

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Systems Biology

Background:

  • Hub genes are crucial in biological networks, but their role in genomic data analysis is debated.
  • Multiple genomic datasets allow for comparing standard statistical methods (e.g., meta-analysis) with co-expression network analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the biological insights and validation success of meta-analysis versus consensus network analysis for identifying key genes.
  • To evaluate these approaches across diverse genomic datasets, including gene expression and DNA methylation.

Main Methods:

  • Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) for consensus module identification and intramodular hub selection.
  • Meta-analysis of multiple genomic datasets (lung cancer survival, age-related methylation, mouse cholesterol).
  • Comparison of biological meaningfulness and independent data set validation success.

Main Results:

  • Intramodular hub gene identification yielded more biologically meaningful gene lists than meta-analysis p-values.
  • Meta-analysis demonstrated comparable or superior validation success (reproducibility) compared to consensus network analysis.
  • Novel R functions for consensus network analysis, network-based screening, and meta-analysis were presented.

Conclusions:

  • Consensus network analysis is superior for discovering biologically relevant genes, while meta-analysis excels in validation.
  • The choice of method depends on the research goal: biological discovery versus clinical validation.
  • The study provides practical tools and insights for analyzing multiple genomic datasets.