Immunization with a MOMP-based vaccine protects mice against a pulmonary Chlamydia challenge and identifies a

Connor P O'Meara1, Charles W Armitage, Marina C G Harvie

  • 1Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Plos One
|April 25, 2013
PubMed

Insights

Developing a Chlamydia pneumoniae vaccine is crucial. Sublingual and transcutaneous immunization with major outer membrane protein (MOMP) and CT/CpG adjuvant offered significant protection against infection and lung scarring in mice.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Vaccinology
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • * Chlamydia pneumoniae causes up to 20% of community-acquired pneumonia.
  • * Mild or asymptomatic infections highlight the need for effective vaccines to reduce disease prevalence.
  • * Chronic inflammatory diseases can be exacerbated by C. pneumoniae infections.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To evaluate the efficacy of different immunization routes (intranasal, sublingual, transcutaneous) for a C. pneumoniae vaccine.
  • * To assess protection against infection and lung pathology using recombinant major outer membrane protein (MOMP) with specific adjuvants.
  • * To investigate the immune responses associated with protection and pathology in a mouse model.

Main Methods:

  • * C. muridarum mouse model of infection.
  • * Immunization via intranasal (IN), sublingual (SL), or transcutaneous (TC) routes with MOMP and adjuvants (CTA1-DD or CT/CpG).
  • * Intranasal challenge with C. muridarum and assessment of chlamydial burden, weight loss, and lung pathology (fibrotic scarring).
  • * Analysis of antigen-specific immune responses (IFNγ, TNFα, IL-17) in splenocytes and lymph nodes.

Main Results:

  • * SL and TC immunization with MOMP and CT/CpG provided significant protection, reducing lung chlamydial burden and preventing weight loss, comparable to live infection.
  • * These routes also offered near-complete protection against lung fibrotic scarring, a benefit not seen with prior infection.
  • * IN immunization with MOMP protected against infection but not pathology, while TC immunization with MOMP and CTA1-DD protected against pathology despite similar bacterial loads to controls.

Conclusions:

  • * Sublingual and transcutaneous immunization routes with MOMP and CT/CpG adjuvant are highly effective in a C. muridarum mouse model.
  • * Protection against infection and pathology can be dissociated, suggesting pathology may be driven by the adaptive immune response independent of bacterial load.
  • * Findings provide insights for designing future Chlamydia vaccines that target both infection and immunopathology.

Related Concept Videos